mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluation of adaptive sampling methods in scenario generation for virtual safety impact assessment of pre-crash safety systems

arXiv 2503.00815 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2025stat.AP cs.LG stat.COcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Virtual safety assessment plays a vital role in evaluating the safety impact of pre-crash safety systems such as advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and automated driving systems (ADS). However, as the number of parameters in simulation-based scenario generation increases, the number of crash scenarios to simulate grows exponentially, making complete enumeration computationally infeasible. Efficient sampling methods, such as importance sampling and active sampling, have been proposed to address this challenge. However, a comprehensive evaluation of how domain knowledge, stratification, and batch sampling affect their efficiency remains limited. This study evaluates the performance of importance sampling and active sampling in scenario generation, incorporating two domain-knowledge-driven features: adaptive sample space reduction (ASSR) and stratification. Additionally, we assess the effects of a third feature, batch sampling, on computational efficiency in terms of both CPU and wall-clock time. Based on our findings, we provide practical recommendations for applying ASSR, stratification, and batch sampling to optimize sampling performance. Our results demonstrate that ASSR substantially improves sampling efficiency for both importance sampling and active sampling. When integrated into active sampling, ASSR reduces the root mean squared estimation error (RMSE) of the estimates by up to 90%. Stratification further improves sampling performance for both methods, regardless of ASSR implementation. When ASSR and/or stratification are applied, importance sampling performs on par with active sampling, whereas when neither feature is used, active sampling is more efficient. Larger batch sizes reduce wall-clock time but increase the number of simulations required to achieve the same estimation accuracy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2025.

Builds on

11 of 66 references.

References · 11

  1. 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 734
  2. 2015ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and Rcited by 171
  3. 2021Batch Active Learning at Scalecited by 127
  4. 2022A Survey on Safety-Critical Driving Scenario Generation -- A Methodological Perspectivecited by 100
  5. 2016Accelerated Evaluation of Automated Vehicles Safety in Lane Change Scenarios Based on Importance Sampling Techniquescited by 44
  6. 2018Learning To Simulatecited by 43
  7. 2016Coupling Adaptive Batch Sizes with Learning Ratescited by 29
  8. 2017AdaBatch: Adaptive Batch Sizes for Training Deep Neural Networkscited by 29
  9. 2021CausalCity: Complex Simulations with Agency for Causal Discovery and Reasoningcited by 23
  10. 2022Active sampling: A machine-learning-assisted framework for finite population inference with optimal subsamplescited by 3
  11. 2023Optimal subsampling designscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.