Rehearse With User: Personalized Opinion Summarization via Role-Playing based on Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Personalized opinion summarization is crucial as it considers individual user interests while generating product summaries. Recent studies show that although large language models demonstrate powerful text summarization and evaluation capabilities without the need for training data, they face difficulties in personalized tasks involving long texts. To address this, Rehearsal, a personalized opinion summarization framework via LLMs-based role-playing is proposed. Having the model act as the user, the model can better understand the user's personalized needs. Additionally, a role-playing supervisor and practice process are introduced to improve the role-playing ability of the LLMs, leading to a better expression of user needs. Furthermore, through suggestions from virtual users, the summary generation is intervened, ensuring that the generated summary includes information of interest to the user, thus achieving personalized summary generation. Experiment results demonstrate that our method can effectively improve the level of personalization in large model-generated summaries.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2025.
Builds on
25 of 58 references.
References · 25
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,784
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,439
- 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,395
- 2023Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Contextcited by 841
- 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 742
- 2023Self-collaboration Code Generation via ChatGPTcited by 258
- 2024Two Tales of Persona in LLMs: A Survey of Role-Playing and Personalizationcited by 208
- 2023What can Large Language Models do in chemistry? A comprehensive benchmark on eight taskscited by 185
- 2024Concise Thoughts: Impact of Output Length on LLM Reasoning and Costcited by 109
- 2023Examining Inter-Consistency of Large Language Models Collaboration: An In-depth Analysis via Debatecited by 97
- 2023Guiding Large Language Models via Directional Stimulus Promptingcited by 95
13 more
- 2024FineSurE: Fine-grained Summarization Evaluation using LLMscited by 83
- 2019Unsupervised Opinion Summarization as Copycat-Review Generationcited by 68
- 2023Are LLMs All You Need for Task-Oriented Dialogue?cited by 54
- 2024Persona-DB: Efficient Large Language Model Personalization for Response Prediction with Collaborative Data Refinementcited by 49
- 2023Knowledge-Augmented Large Language Models for Personalized Contextual Query Suggestioncited by 43
- 2020Unsupervised Opinion Summarization with Noising and Denoisingcited by 37
- 2024Personalized LLM Response Generation with Parameterized Memory Injectioncited by 33
- 2023Let GPT be a Math Tutor: Teaching Math Word Problem Solvers with Customized Exercise Generationcited by 29
- 2021Convex Aggregation for Opinion Summarizationcited by 21
- 2024One Prompt To Rule Them All: LLMs for Opinion Summary Evaluationcited by 16
- 2023Prompt Tuning Large Language Models on Personalized Aspect Extraction for Recommendationscited by 13
- 2023Towards Personalized Review Summarization by Modeling Historical Reviews from Customer and Product Separatelycited by 9
- 2023Enhancing Large Language Model Induced Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems Through Look-Forward Motivated Goalscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.