Rare event modeling with self-regularized normalizing flows: what can we learn from a single failure?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Increased deployment of autonomous systems in fields like transportation and robotics have seen a corresponding increase in safety-critical failures. These failures can be difficult to model and debug due to the relative lack of data: compared to tens of thousands of examples from normal operations, we may have only seconds of data leading up to the failure. This scarcity makes it challenging to train generative models of rare failure events, as existing methods risk either overfitting to noise in the limited failure dataset or underfitting due to an overly strong prior. We address this challenge with CalNF, or calibrated normalizing flows, a self-regularized framework for posterior learning from limited data. CalNF achieves state-of-the-art performance on data-limited failure modeling and inverse problems and enables a first-of-a-kind case study into the root causes of the 2022 Southwest Airlines scheduling crisis.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2025.
Builds on
31 of 54 references.
References · 31
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
- 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
- 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
- 2016Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flowcited by 636
- 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 590
- 2018Pyro: Deep Universal Probabilistic Programmingcited by 379
- 2018Invertible Residual Networkscited by 364
- 2021CFLOW-AD: Real-Time Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Localization via Conditional Normalizing Flowscited by 320
- 2019Residual Flows for Invertible Generative Modelingcited by 256
- 2020How to train your neural ODE: the world of Jacobian and kinetic regularizationcited by 228
19 more
- 2020Same Same But DifferNet: Semi-Supervised Defect Detection with Normalizing Flowscited by 212
- 2018Neural Autoregressive Flowscited by 207
- 2021Few-shot Image Generation via Cross-domain Correspondencecited by 206
- 2022Guided Conditional Diffusion for Controllable Traffic Simulationcited by 189
- 2020OT-Flow: Fast and Accurate Continuous Normalizing Flows via Optimal Transportcited by 143
- 2019Invertible generative models for inverse problems: mitigating representation error and dataset biascited by 93
- 2018Scalable End-to-End Autonomous Vehicle Testing via Rare-event Simulationcited by 76
- 2020A Survey of Algorithms for Black-Box Safety Validation of Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 71
- 2017A Bayesian Data Augmentation Approach for Learning Deep Modelscited by 50
- 2021OpenFWI: Large-Scale Multi-Structural Benchmark Datasets for Seismic Full Waveform Inversioncited by 44
- 2020Neural Bridge Sampling for Evaluating Safety-Critical Autonomous Systemscited by 34
- 2023Toward Understanding Generative Data Augmentationcited by 25
- 2023A Survey on Generative Modeling with Limited Data, Few Shots, and Zero Shotcited by 19
- 2021Few-shot Image Generation with Mixup-based Distance Learningcited by 16
- 2021On the expressivity of bi-Lipschitz normalizing flowscited by 15
- 2019ALFA: A Dataset for UAV Fault and Anomaly Detectioncited by 8
- 2022Optimization for Amortized Inverse Problemscited by 6
- 2023Model-based Validation as Probabilistic Inferencecited by 3
- 2023Rare Event Probability Learning by Normalizing Flowscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.