mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Structured Preference Optimization for Vision-Language Long-Horizon Task Planning

arXiv 2502.20742 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2025cs.CV cs.AI cs.CLcited by 7

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Diffusion and multimodal model alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing methods for vision-language task planning excel in short-horizon tasks but often fall short in complex, long-horizon planning within dynamic environments. These challenges primarily arise from the difficulty of effectively training models to produce high-quality reasoning processes for long-horizon tasks. To address this, we propose Structured Preference Optimization (SPO), which aims to enhance reasoning and action selection in long-horizon task planning through structured preference evaluation and optimized training strategies. Specifically, SPO introduces: 1) Preference-Based Scoring and Optimization, which systematically evaluates reasoning chains based on task relevance, visual grounding, and historical consistency; and 2) Curriculum-Guided Training, where the model progressively adapts from simple to complex tasks, improving its generalization ability in long-horizon scenarios and enhancing reasoning robustness. To advance research in vision-language long-horizon task planning, we introduce ExtendaBench, a comprehensive benchmark covering 1,509 tasks across VirtualHome and Habitat 2.0, categorized into ultra-short, short, medium, and long tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that SPO significantly improves reasoning quality and final decision accuracy, outperforming prior methods on long-horizon tasks and underscoring the effectiveness of preference-driven optimization in vision-language task planning. Specifically, SPO achieves a +5.98% GCR and +4.68% SR improvement in VirtualHome and a +3.30% GCR and +2.11% SR improvement in Habitat over the best-performing baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and multimodal model alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 50 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2025.

Builds on

50 of 88 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Modality-Fair Preference Optimization for Trustworthy MLLM Alignment20 Oct

Other references · 49

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  6. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  7. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
  8. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
  9. 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,071
  10. 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scalingcited by 1,599
  11. 2022Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Controlcited by 1,210
  12. 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,205
37 more
  1. 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Modelscited by 1,081
  2. 2024How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suitescited by 1,050
  3. 2023mPLUG-Owl: Modularization Empowers Large Language Models with Multimodalitycited by 1,040
  4. 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,035
  5. 2019ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Taskscited by 783
  6. 2023Large Language Modelscited by 780
  7. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
  8. 2021Habitat 2.0: Training Home Assistants to Rearrange their Habitatcited by 511
  9. 2023LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiencycited by 501
  10. 2018VirtualHome: Simulating Household Activities via Programscited by 415
  11. 2023ChatGPT for Robotics: Design Principles and Model Abilitiescited by 299
  12. 2023SayPlan: Grounding Large Language Models using 3D Scene Graphs for Scalable Robot Task Planningcited by 294
  13. 2023Large Language Models as Commonsense Knowledge for Large-Scale Task Planningcited by 231
  14. 2022Pre-Trained Language Models for Interactive Decision-Makingcited by 221
  15. 2019Search on the Replay Buffer: Bridging Planning and Reinforcement Learningcited by 194
  16. 2024Direct Nash Optimization: Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve with General Preferencescited by 178
  17. 2023REFLECT: Summarizing Robot Experiences for Failure Explanation and Correctioncited by 175
  18. 2018PDDLStream: Integrating Symbolic Planners and Blackbox Samplers via Optimistic Adaptive Planningcited by 150
  19. 2023Task and Motion Planning with Large Language Models for Object Rearrangementcited by 141
  20. 2019Language as an Abstraction for Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 138
  21. 2023Some things are more CRINGE than others: Iterative Preference Optimization with the Pairwise Cringe Losscited by 108
  22. 2024GLoRe: When, Where, and How to Improve LLM Reasoning via Global and Local Refinementscited by 103
  23. 2024Chain of Preference Optimization: Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMscited by 96
  24. 2023Large Language Models as Generalizable Policies for Embodied Taskscited by 86
  25. 2019Hierarchical Foresight: Self-Supervised Learning of Long-Horizon Tasks via Visual Subgoal Generationcited by 83
  26. 2017Neural Task Programming: Learning to Generalize Across Hierarchical Taskscited by 76
  27. 2018Learning Plannable Representations with Causal InfoGANcited by 57
  28. 2024Constraint-Aware Zero-Shot Vision-Language Navigation in Continuous Environmentscited by 50
  29. 2023ChatGPT Empowered Long-Step Robot Control in Various Environments: A Case Applicationcited by 48
  30. 2023Errors are Useful Prompts: Instruction Guided Task Programming with Verifier-Assisted Iterative Promptingcited by 46
  31. 2018Task Planning in Robotics: an Empirical Comparison of PDDL-based and ASP-based Systemscited by 40
  32. 2019Regression Planning Networkscited by 32
  33. 2023Bootstrapping Vision-Language Learning with Decoupled Language Pre-trainingcited by 28
  34. 2024Pragmatic Instruction Following and Goal Assistance via Cooperative Language-Guided Inverse Planningcited by 28
  35. 2023Integrating Action Knowledge and LLMs for Task Planning and Situation Handling in Open Worldscited by 26
  36. 2024Grounding LLMs For Robot Task Planning Using Closed-loop State Feedbackcited by 25
  37. 2023Embodied Executable Policy Learning with Language-based Scene Summarizationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025World Modeling Makes a Better Planner: Dual Preference Optimization for Embodied Task Planning
  2. 2025Knowing the Answer Isn't Enough: Fixing Reasoning Path Failures in LVLMs
  3. 2026Explicit Language Memory for Long-Horizon Planning in Vision-Language-Action Models
  4. 2026SVLL: Staged Vision-Language Learning for Physically Grounded Embodied Task Planning
  5. 2025Fine-Grained Preference Optimization Improves Spatial Reasoning in VLMs
  6. 2026PROGRESSLM: Towards Progress Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  7. 2026MPCoT: Reward-Guided Multi-Path Latent Reasoning for Test-Time Scalable Vision-Language-Action
  8. 2025PROPA: Toward Process-level Optimization in Visual Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning