On the Role of Individual Differences in Current Approaches to Computational Image Aesthetics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Image aesthetic assessment (IAA) evaluates image aesthetics, a task complicated by image diversity and user subjectivity. Current approaches address this in two stages: Generic IAA (GIAA) models estimate mean aesthetic scores, while Personal IAA (PIAA) models adapt GIAA using transfer learning to incorporate user subjectivity. However, a theoretical understanding of transfer learning between GIAA and PIAA, particularly concerning the impact of group composition, group size, aesthetic differences between groups and individuals, and demographic correlations, is lacking. This work establishes a theoretical foundation for IAA, proposing a unified model that encodes individual characteristics in a distributional format for both individual and group assessments. We show that transferring from GIAA to PIAA involves extrapolation, while the reverse involves interpolation, which is generally more effective for machine learning. Extensive experiments with varying group compositions, including sub-sampling by group size and disjoint demographics, reveal substantial performance variation even for GIAA, challenging the assumption that averaging scores eliminates individual subjectivity. Score-distribution analysis using Earth Mover's Distance (EMD) and the Gini index identifies education, photography experience, and art experience as key factors in aesthetic differences, with greater subjectivity in artworks than in photographs. Code is available at https://github.com/lwchen6309/aesthetics_transfer_learning.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2025.
Builds on
21 of 52 references.
References · 21
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
- 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,322
- 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,290
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,076
- 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,058
- 2017NIMA: Neural Image Assessmentcited by 387
9 more
- 2017Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?cited by 220
- 2019Task2Vec: Task Embedding for Meta-Learningcited by 197
- 2019GANalyze: Toward Visual Definitions of Cognitive Image Propertiescited by 193
- 2016Photo Aesthetics Ranking Network with Attributes and Content Adaptationcited by 122
- 2023VILA: Learning Image Aesthetics from User Comments with Vision-Language Pretrainingcited by 63
- 2022Personalized Image Aesthetics Assessment with Rich Attributescited by 56
- 2023Towards Artistic Image Aesthetics Assessment: a Large-scale Dataset and a New Methodcited by 48
- 2024Scaling Up Personalized Image Aesthetic Assessment via Task Vector Customizationcited by 6
- 2024BackFlip: The Impact of Local and Global Data Augmentations on Artistic Image Aesthetic Assessmentcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.