mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Analyzing CLIP's Performance Limitations in Multi-Object Scenarios: A Controlled High-Resolution Study

arXiv 2502.19828 ↗First posted 27 Feb 2025cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) models have demonstrated remarkable performance in zero-shot classification tasks, yet their efficacy in handling complex multi-object scenarios remains challenging. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of CLIP's performance limitations in multi-object contexts through controlled experiments. We introduce two custom datasets, SimCO and CompCO, to evaluate CLIP's image and text encoders in various multi-object configurations. Our findings reveal significant biases in both encoders: the image encoder favors larger objects, while the text encoder prioritizes objects mentioned first in descriptions. We hypothesize these biases originate from CLIP's training process and provide evidence through analyses of the COCO dataset and CLIP's training progression. Additionally, we extend our investigation to Stable Diffusion models, revealing that biases in the CLIP text encoder significantly impact text-to-image generation tasks. Our experiments demonstrate how these biases affect CLIP's performance in image-caption matching and generation tasks, particularly when manipulating object sizes and their order in captions. This work contributes valuable insights into CLIP's behavior in complex visual environments and highlights areas for improvement in future vision-language models.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2025.

Builds on

20 of 20 references.

References · 20

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  4. 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,356
  5. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  6. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
  7. 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,555
  8. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  9. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,173
  10. 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 735
  11. 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 644
  12. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 610
8 more
  1. 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 529
  2. 2023Scaling Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 343
  3. 2022CREPE: Can Vision-Language Foundation Models Reason Compositionally?cited by 181
  4. 2024Multi-Object Hallucination in Vision-Language Modelscited by 60
  5. 2024MLLM-CompBench: A Comparative Reasoning Benchmark for Multimodal LLMscited by 32
  6. 2024Improving Compositional Attribute Binding in Text-to-Image Generative Models via Enhanced Text Embeddingscited by 19
  7. 2024BEAF: Observing BEfore-AFter Changes to Evaluate Hallucination in Vision-language Modelscited by 18
  8. 2024CLoVe: Encoding Compositional Language in Contrastive Vision-Language Modelscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025CLIP Under the Microscope: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Multi-Object Representation
  2. 2024Toward a Holistic Evaluation of Robustness in CLIP Models
  3. 2024Diffusion Feedback Helps CLIP See Better
  4. 2024Modeling Caption Diversity in Contrastive Vision-Language Pretraining
  5. 2026CLIP Is Shortsighted: Paying Attention Beyond the First Sentence
  6. 2026Sparse CLIP: Co-Optimizing Interpretability and Performance in Contrastive Learning
  7. 2025Data or Language Supervision: What Makes CLIP Better than DINO?
  8. 2025Common Data Properties Limit Object-Attribute Binding in CLIP