Mixtraining: A Better Trade-Off Between Compute and Performance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Incorporating self-supervised learning (SSL) before standard supervised learning (SL) has become a widely used strategy to enhance model performance, particularly in data-limited scenarios. However, this approach introduces a trade-off between computation and performance: while SSL helps with representation learning, it requires a separate, often time-consuming training phase, increasing computational overhead and limiting efficiency in resource-constrained settings. To address these challenges, we propose MixTraining, a novel framework that interleaves several SSL and SL epochs within a unified mixtraining training phase, featuring a smooth transition between two learning objectives. MixTraining enhances synergy between SSL and SL for improved accuracy and consolidates shared computation steps to reduce computation overhead. MixTraining is versatile and applicable to both single-task and multi-task learning scenarios. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MixTraining offers a superior compute-performance trade-off compared to conventional pipelines, achieving an 8.81% absolute accuracy gain (18.89% relative accuracy gain) on the TinyImageNet dataset while accelerating training by up to 1.29x with the ViT-Tiny model.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2025.
Builds on
49 of 64 references.
References · 49
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
37 more
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
- 2021HuBERT: Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning by Masked Prediction of Hidden Unitscited by 2,301
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
- 2021WavLM: Large-Scale Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Full Stack Speech Processingcited by 1,609
- 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,548
- 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 993
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
- 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 641
- 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 623
- 2021ImageNet-21K Pretraining for the Massescited by 607
- 2020What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?cited by 578
- 2021Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Surveycited by 457
- 2021ResNet strikes back: An improved training procedure in timmcited by 365
- 2019S4L: Self-Supervised Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 335
- 2020On the Stability of Fine-tuning BERT: Misconceptions, Explanations, and Strong Baselinescited by 254
- 2022Prioritized Training on Points that are Learnable, Worth Learning, and Not Yet Learntcited by 233
- 2022TinyViT: Fast Pretraining Distillation for Small Vision Transformerscited by 232
- 2020Unsupervised Intra-domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation through Self-Supervisioncited by 198
- 2019To Tune or Not to Tune? Adapting Pretrained Representations to Diverse Taskscited by 167
- 2023Large-scale Multi-Modal Pre-trained Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 153
- 2021An Empirical Investigation of the Role of Pre-training in Lifelong Learningcited by 134
- 2023Swin3D: A Pretrained Transformer Backbone for 3D Indoor Scene Understandingcited by 111
- 2021AdaMatch: A Unified Approach to Semi-Supervised Learning and Domain Adaptationcited by 104
- 2021AutoMix: Unveiling the Power of Mixup for Stronger Classifierscited by 69
- 2021Reducing Label Effort: Self-Supervised meets Active Learningcited by 42
- 2021NLP From Scratch Without Large-Scale Pretraining: A Simple and Efficient Frameworkcited by 34
- 2021Simple Training Strategies and Model Scaling for Object Detectioncited by 25
- 2024An Experimental Design Framework for Label-Efficient Supervised Finetuning of Large Language Modelscited by 22
- 2023LabelBench: A Comprehensive Framework for Benchmarking Adaptive Label-Efficient Learningcited by 20
- 2022MixupE: Understanding and Improving Mixup from Directional Derivative Perspectivecited by 6
- 2024Efficient Training of Self-Supervised Speech Foundation Models on a Compute Budgetcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.