mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multi-Platform Autobidding with and without Predictions

arXiv 2502.19317 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2025cs.GTcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of finding the optimal bidding strategy for an advertiser in a multi-platform auction setting. The competition on a platform is captured by a value and a cost function, mapping bidding strategies to value and cost respectively. We assume a diminishing returns property, whereby the marginal cost is increasing in value. The advertiser uses an autobidder that selects a bidding strategy for each platform, aiming to maximize total value subject to budget and return-on-spend constraint. The advertiser has no prior information and learns about the value and cost functions by querying a platform with a specific bidding strategy. Our goal is to design algorithms that find the optimal bidding strategy with a small number of queries. We first present an algorithm that requires (O(m log (mn) log n)) queries, where m is the number of platforms and n is the number of possible bidding strategies in each platform. Moreover, we adopt the learning-augmented framework and propose an algorithm that utilizes a (possibly erroneous) prediction of the optimal bidding strategy. We provide a O(m log (mη) log η) query-complexity bound on our algorithm as a function of the prediction error η. This guarantee gracefully degrades to (O(m log (mn) log n)). This achieves a ``best-of-both-worlds'' scenario: (O(m)) queries when given a correct prediction, and (O(m log (mn) log n)) even for an arbitrary incorrect prediction.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.