Sparse Brains are Also Adaptive Brains: Cognitive-Load-Aware Dynamic Activation for LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dense large language models(LLMs) face critical efficiency bottlenecks as they rigidly activate all parameters regardless of input complexity. While existing sparsity methods(static pruning or dynamic activation) address this partially, they either lack adaptivity to contextual or model structural demands or incur prohibitive computational overhead. Inspired by human brain's dual-process mechanisms - predictive coding (N400) for backbone sparsity and structural reanalysis (P600) for complex context - we propose CLADA, a textitCognitive-Load-Aware Dynamic Activation framework that synergizes statistical sparsity with semantic adaptability. Our key insight is that LLM activations exhibit two complementary patterns: 1) textitGlobal statistical sparsity driven by sequence-level prefix information, and 2) textitLocal semantic adaptability modulated by cognitive load metrics(e.g., surprisal and entropy). CLADA employs a hierarchical thresholding strategy: a baseline from offline error-controlled optimization ensures 40%+ sparsity, dynamically adjusted by real-time cognitive signals. Evaluations across six mainstream LLMs and nine benchmarks demonstrate that CLADA achieves ~20% average speedup with <2% accuracy drop, outperforming Griffin (5%+ degradation) and TT (negligible speedup). Crucially, we establish the first formal connection between neurolinguistic event-related potential (ERP) components and LLM efficiency mechanisms through multi-level regression analysis (R2=0.17 for sparsity-adaptation synergy). Requiring no retraining or architectural changes, CLADA offers a deployable solution for resource-aware LLM inference while advancing biologically-inspired AI design. Our code is available at hrefhttps://github.com/Oldify/CLADACLADA.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2025.
Builds on
32 of 49 references.
References · 32
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
- 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,121
- 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 812
20 more
- 2018CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challengecited by 683
- 2024SliceGPT: Compress Large Language Models by Deleting Rows and Columnscited by 385
- 2025Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Modelscited by 311
- 2023Deja Vu: Contextual Sparsity for Efficient LLMs at Inference Timecited by 252
- 2020Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Needcited by 201
- 2022SCROLLS: Standardized CompaRison Over Long Language Sequencescited by 170
- 2021Activation Functions in Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey and Benchmarkcited by 155
- 2021MoEfication: Transformer Feed-forward Layers are Mixtures of Expertscited by 152
- 2024LLM Inference Unveiled: Survey and Roofline Model Insightscited by 152
- 2023Testing the Predictions of Surprisal Theory in 11 Languagescited by 77
- 2024Attention Score is not All You Need for Token Importance Indicator in KV Cache Reduction: Value Also Matterscited by 73
- 2024Dense Training, Sparse Inference: Rethinking Training of Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelscited by 42
- 2024Frequency Explains the Inverse Correlation of Large Language Models' Size, Training Data Amount, and Surprisal's Fit to Reading Timescited by 39
- 2024Lory: Fully Differentiable Mixture-of-Experts for Autoregressive Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 37
- 2024System-1.x: Learning to Balance Fast and Slow Planning with Language Modelscited by 35
- 2024Prompt-prompted Adaptive Structured Pruning for Efficient LLM Generationcited by 21
- 2023Exploiting Activation Sparsity with Dense to Dynamic-k Mixture-of-Experts Conversioncited by 16
- 2023Model-Based Control with Sparse Neural Dynamicscited by 16
- 2024Dynamic Activation Pitfalls in LLaMA Models: An Empirical Studycited by 3
- 2024Decomposition of surprisal: Unified computational model of ERP components in language processingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.