mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Provably Efficient RL for Linear MDPs under Instantaneous Safety Constraints in Non-Convex Feature Spaces

arXiv 2502.18655 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2025cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In Reinforcement Learning (RL), tasks with instantaneous hard constraints present significant challenges, particularly when the decision space is non-convex or non-star-convex. This issue is especially relevant in domains like autonomous vehicles and robotics, where constraints such as collision avoidance often take a non-convex form. In this paper, we establish a regret bound of tildeObigl(bigl(1 + tfrac1τbigr) √log(tfrac1τ) d3 H4 K bigr), applicable to both star-convex and non-star-convex cases, where d is the feature dimension, H the episode length, K the number of episodes, and τ the safety threshold. Moreover, the violation of safety constraints is zero with high probability throughout the learning process. A key technical challenge in these settings is bounding the covering number of the value-function class, which is essential for achieving value-aware uniform concentration in model-free function approximation. For the star-convex setting, we develop a novel technique called Objective Constraint-Decomposition (OCD) to properly bound the covering number. This result also resolves an error in a previous work on constrained RL. In non-star-convex scenarios, where the covering number can become infinitely large, we propose a two-phase algorithm, Non-Convex Safe Least Squares Value Iteration (NCS-LSVI), which first reduces uncertainty about the safe set by playing a known safe policy. After that, it carefully balances exploration and exploitation to achieve the regret bound. Finally, numerical simulations on an autonomous driving scenario demonstrate the effectiveness of NCS-LSVI.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2025.

Builds on

25 of 33 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
  2. 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 514
  3. 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 397
  4. 2020Projection-Based Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 195
  5. 2020Exploration-Exploitation in Constrained MDPscited by 146
  6. 2020Provably Efficient Safe Exploration via Primal-Dual Policy Optimizationcited by 131
  7. 2019Linear Stochastic Bandits Under Safety Constraintscited by 90
  8. 2019Safe Policies for Reinforcement Learning via Primal-Dual Methodscited by 75
  9. 2020Stochastic Bandits with Linear Constraintscited by 68
  10. 2020Upper Confidence Primal-Dual Reinforcement Learning for CMDP with Adversarial Losscited by 46
  11. 2021Achieving Zero Constraint Violation for Constrained Reinforcement Learning via Primal-Dual Approachcited by 46
  12. 2019Safe Linear Thompson Sampling with Side Informationcited by 37
13 more
  1. 2022Near-Optimal Sample Complexity Bounds for Constrained MDPscited by 36
  2. 2021Safe Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 33
  3. 2022Provably Efficient Model-Free Constrained RL with Linear Function Approximationcited by 29
  4. 2020Stage-wise Conservative Linear Banditscited by 28
  5. 2019Safe Linear Stochastic Banditscited by 27
  6. 2022On Kernelized Multi-Armed Bandits with Constraintscited by 23
  7. 2023A Near-Optimal Algorithm for Safe Reinforcement Learning Under Instantaneous Hard Constraintscited by 15
  8. 2024Contextual Bandits with Stage-wise Constraintscited by 12
  9. 2022Safe Exploration Incurs Nearly No Additional Sample Complexity for Reward-free RLcited by 9
  10. 2023Directional Optimism for Safe Linear Banditscited by 8
  11. 2023Convex Methods for Constrained Linear Banditscited by 5
  12. 2023Safe Reinforcement Learning with Instantaneous Constraints: The Role of Aggressive Explorationcited by 5
  13. 2022Interference Constrained Beam Alignment for Time-Varying Channels via Kernelized Banditscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

6 papers.