mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Heterogeneous Decision Making in Mixed Traffic: Uncertainty-aware Planning and Bounded Rationality

arXiv 2502.18529 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2025cs.MA cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The past few years have witnessed a rapid growth of the deployment of automated vehicles (AVs). Clearly, AVs and human-driven vehicles (HVs) will co-exist for many years, and AVs will have to operate around HVs, pedestrians, cyclists, and more, calling for fundamental breakthroughs in AI designed for mixed traffic to achieve mixed autonomy. Thus motivated, we study heterogeneous decision making by AVs and HVs in a mixed traffic environment, aiming to capture the interactions between human and machine decision-making and develop an AI foundation that enables vehicles to operate safely and efficiently. There are a number of challenges to achieve mixed autonomy, including 1) humans drivers make driving decisions with bounded rationality, and it remains open to develop accurate models for HVs' decision making; and 2) uncertainty-aware planning plays a critical role for AVs to take safety maneuvers in response to the human behavior. In this paper, we introduce a formulation of AV-HV interaction, where the HV makes decisions with bounded rationality and the AV employs uncertainty-aware planning based on the prediction on HV's future actions. We conduct a comprehensive analysis on AV and HV's learning regret to answer the questions: 1) {How does the learning performance depend on HV's bounded rationality and AV's planning}; 2) {How do different decision making strategies impact the overall learning performance}? Our findings reveal some intriguing phenomena, such as Goodhart's Law in AV's learning performance and compounding effects in HV's decision making process. By examining the dynamics of the regrets, we gain insights into the interplay between human and machine decision making.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2025.

Builds on

12 of 43 references.

References · 12

  1. 2019A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologiescited by 373
  2. 2020"Other-Play" for Zero-Shot Coordinationcited by 194
  3. 2017Autonomous Agents Modelling Other Agents: A Comprehensive Survey and Open Problemscited by 126
  4. 2019A Wasserstein-type distance in the space of Gaussian Mixture Modelscited by 75
  5. 2022A Survey on Model-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
  6. 2018Hierarchical Game-Theoretic Planning for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 48
  7. 2020Learning Off-Policy with Online Planningcited by 46
  8. 2022A Survey of Ad Hoc Teamwork Researchcited by 41
  9. 2019Learning to Combat Compounding-Error in Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 39
  10. 2020Human-Like Decision Making for Autonomous Driving: A Noncooperative Game Theoretic Approachcited by 30
  11. 2021Safety Assurances for Human-Robot Interaction via Confidence-aware Game-theoretic Human Modelscited by 21
  12. 2022On the Impossibility of Learning to Cooperate with Adaptive Partner Strategies in Repeated Gamescited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.