Uncertainty Modeling in Multimodal Speech Analysis Across the Psychosis Spectrum
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Capturing subtle speech disruptions across the psychosis spectrum is challenging because of the inherent variability in speech patterns. This variability reflects individual differences and the fluctuating nature of symptoms in both clinical and non-clinical populations. Accounting for uncertainty in speech data is essential for predicting symptom severity and improving diagnostic precision. Speech disruptions characteristic of psychosis appear across the spectrum, including in non-clinical individuals. We develop an uncertainty-aware model integrating acoustic and linguistic features to predict symptom severity and psychosis-related traits. Quantifying uncertainty in specific modalities allows the model to address speech variability, improving prediction accuracy. We analyzed speech data from 114 participants, including 32 individuals with early psychosis and 82 with low or high schizotypy, collected through structured interviews, semi-structured autobiographical tasks, and narrative-driven interactions in German. The model improved prediction accuracy, reducing RMSE and achieving an F1-score of 83% with ECE = 4.5e-2, showing robust performance across different interaction contexts. Uncertainty estimation improved model interpretability by identifying reliability differences in speech markers such as pitch variability, fluency disruptions, and spectral instability. The model dynamically adjusted to task structures, weighting acoustic features more in structured settings and linguistic features in unstructured contexts. This approach strengthens early detection, personalized assessment, and clinical decision-making in psychosis-spectrum research.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2025.
Builds on
16 of 77 references.
References · 16
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,853
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
- 2023WhisperX: Time-Accurate Speech Transcription of Long-Form Audiocited by 320
- 2020MISA: Modality-Invariant and -Specific Representations for Multimodal Sentiment Analysiscited by 262
- 2021XTREME-R: Towards More Challenging and Nuanced Multilingual Evaluationcited by 167
- 2021End-to-end speaker segmentation for overlap-aware resegmentationcited by 76
- 2018Topic Modeling Based Multi-modal Depression Detectioncited by 29
- 2020Artificial Intelligence, speech and language processing approaches to monitoring Alzheimer's Disease: a systematic reviewcited by 29
4 more
- 2022COLD Fusion: Calibrated and Ordinal Latent Distribution Fusion for Uncertainty-Aware Multimodal Emotion Recognitioncited by 22
- 2023Leveraging Large Language Models for Exploiting ASR Uncertaintycited by 15
- 2024Are you sure? Analysing Uncertainty Quantification Approaches for Real-world Speech Emotion Recognitioncited by 4
- 2023Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning for Joint Speaker Diarization and Identificationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.