mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Perspective on Symbolic Machine Learning in Physical Sciences

arXiv 2502.17993 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2025cs.LG hep-ph hep-thcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning is rapidly making its pathway across all of the natural sciences, including physical sciences. The rate at which ML is impacting non-scientific disciplines is incomparable to that in the physical sciences. This is partly due to the uninterpretable nature of deep neural networks. Symbolic machine learning stands as an equal and complementary partner to numerical machine learning in speeding up scientific discovery in physics. This perspective discusses the main differences between the ML and scientific approaches. It stresses the need to develop and apply symbolic machine learning to physics problems equally, in parallel to numerical machine learning, because of the dual nature of physics research.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2025.

Builds on

9 of 31 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  3. 2018Fundamentals of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Networkcited by 415
  4. 2022Interpretable Scientific Discovery with Symbolic Regression: A Reviewcited by 105
  5. 2021A Living Review of Machine Learning for Particle Physicscited by 77
  6. 2022Rediscovering orbital mechanics with machine learningcited by 71
  7. 2022Simplifying Polylogarithms with Machine Learningcited by 14
  8. 2022SYMBA: Symbolic Computation of Squared Amplitudes in High Energy Physics with Machine Learningcited by 12
  9. 2024Is machine learning good or bad for the natural sciences?cited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.