MEMERAG: A Multilingual End-to-End Meta-Evaluation Benchmark for Retrieval Augmented Generation
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG pipeline design and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Automatic evaluation of retrieval augmented generation (RAG) systems relies on fine-grained dimensions like faithfulness and relevance, as judged by expert human annotators. Meta-evaluation benchmarks support the development of automatic evaluators that correlate well with human judgement. However, existing benchmarks predominantly focus on English or use translated data, which fails to capture cultural nuances. A native approach provides a better representation of the end user experience. In this work, we develop a Multilingual End-to-end Meta-Evaluation RAG benchmark (MEMERAG). Our benchmark builds on the popular MIRACL dataset, using native-language questions and generating responses with diverse large language models (LLMs), which are then assessed by expert annotators for faithfulness and relevance. We describe our annotation process and show that it achieves high inter-annotator agreement. We then analyse the performance of the answer-generating LLMs across languages as per the human evaluators. Finally we apply the dataset to our main use-case which is to benchmark multilingual automatic evaluators (LLM-as-a-judge). We show that our benchmark can reliably identify improvements offered by advanced prompting techniques and LLMs. Our dataset is available at https://github.com/amazon-science/MEMERAG
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 15 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2025.
Builds on
15 of 32 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2024MIRAGE-Bench: Automatic Multilingual Benchmark Arena for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems17 Oct
- 2024Retrieval-augmented generation in multilingual settings1 Jul
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey18 Dec
- 2023ARES: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems16 Nov
Other references · 11
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 686
- 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 584
- 2024MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documentscited by 257
- 2023ChatGPT Beyond English: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Learningcited by 206
- 2024ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidencecited by 113
- 2023LongEval: Guidelines for Human Evaluation of Faithfulness in Long-form Summarizationcited by 96
- 2024BM25S: Orders of magnitude faster lexical search via eager sparse scoringcited by 88
- 2024TofuEval: Evaluating Hallucinations of LLMs on Topic-Focused Dialogue Summarizationcited by 66
- 2020PySBD: Pragmatic Sentence Boundary Disambiguationcited by 38
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.
7 papers.
- 2025Are We on the Right Way for Assessing Document Retrieval-Augmented Generation?cited by 5
- 2026The Consensus Trap: Dissecting Subjectivity and the "Ground Truth" Illusion in Data Annotationcited by 2
- 2025Towards a rigorous evaluation of RAG systems: the challenge of due diligencecited by 1
- 2026Challenges and Recommendations for LLM-as-a-Judge in Multilingual Settings and for Low-Resource Languagescited by 1
- 2025RAGVUE: A Diagnostic View for Explainable and Automated Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 0
- 2026CORAL: Adaptive Retrieval Loop for Culturally-Aligned Multilingual RAGcited by 0
- 2026Beyond Benchmark Scores: How Synthetic and Authentic Query Distributions Diverge in RAG Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Beyond Benchmark Scores: How Synthetic and Authentic Query Distributions Diverge in RAG Evaluation13 Sep 2026
- 2026Challenges and Recommendations for LLM-as-a-Judge in Multilingual Settings and for Low-Resource Languages2 Jul 2026
- 2026CORAL: Adaptive Retrieval Loop for Culturally-Aligned Multilingual RAG28 Apr 2026
- 2026The Consensus Trap: Dissecting Subjectivity and the "Ground Truth" Illusion in Data Annotation11 Feb 2026
- 2025RAGVUE: A Diagnostic View for Explainable and Automated Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation3 Dec 2025
- 2025Are We on the Right Way for Assessing Document Retrieval-Augmented Generation?5 Aug 2025
- 2025Towards a rigorous evaluation of RAG systems: the challenge of due diligence29 Jul 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025On the Consistency of Multilingual Context Utilization in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2025Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
- 2025MIRAGE: A Metric-Intensive Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Evaluation
- 2025Multilingual Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive Task
- 2026Analyzing performance of Retrieval Augmented Generation models for Question Answering Tasks
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Evolution, Current Landscape and Future Directions
- 2024Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey
- 2023Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation