mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Pretrain Value, Not Reward: Decoupled Value Policy Optimization

arXiv 2502.16944 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we explore how directly pretraining a value model simplifies and stabilizes reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). In reinforcement learning, value estimation is the key to policy optimization, distinct from reward supervision. The value function predicts the return-to-go of a partial answer, that is, how promising the partial answer is if it were continued to completion. In RLHF, however, the standard pipeline first pretrains a reward model and then learns a value function online, even though no new reward signals are available once preference data is collected. This makes critic learning redundant, as the process of training a reward model and then deriving a value model is informationally equivalent to directly pretraining a value model. Importantly, this requires no additional supervision, and our value model is trained on exactly the same data used for reward modeling. Building on this insight, we introduce Decoupled Value Policy Optimization (DVPO), a framework that pretrains a Global Value Model (GVM) offline and freezes it as a universal critic for policy learning. The GVM provides stable, fine-grained credit assignment without critic drift or trajectory sampling. Experiments across MT-Bench, Alpaca-Eval, and Arena-Hard demonstrate that DVPO matches or surpasses state-of-the-art RLHF methods. These results highlight RLHF can be reframed as policy-only optimization guided by a single pretrained value model.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 29 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2025.

Builds on

29 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  2. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback15 Dec
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms20 Jul

Other references · 26

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  5. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  6. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  7. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  8. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  9. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,095
  10. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
  11. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
  12. 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 729
14 more
  1. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 562
  2. 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 500
  3. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 499
  4. 2023Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignmentcited by 285
  5. 2024Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Studycited by 262
  6. 2022Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimizationcited by 246
  7. 2024Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part II: Reward Modelingcited by 171
  8. 2023DeepSpeed-Chat: Easy, Fast and Affordable RLHF Training of ChatGPT-like Models at All Scalescited by 108
  9. 2024Aligning Large Language Models with Representation Editing: A Control Perspectivecited by 64
  10. 2023Pairwise Proximal Policy Optimization: Harnessing Relative Feedback for LLM Alignmentcited by 57
  11. 2024The N+ Implementation Details of RLHF with PPO: A Case Study on TL;DR Summarizationcited by 50
  12. 2024Value Augmented Sampling for Language Model Alignment and Personalizationcited by 49
  13. 2023Language Model Alignment with Elastic Resetcited by 34
  14. 2024Don't Forget Your Reward Values: Language Model Alignment via Value-based Calibrationcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Zeroth-Order Policy Gradient for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback without Reward Inference
  2. 2026What Makes Value Learning Efficient in Residual Reinforcement Learning?
  3. 2025Mitigating Reward Over-Optimization in RLHF via Behavior-Supported Regularization
  4. 2025Rethinking KL Regularization in RLHF: From Value Estimation to Gradient Optimization
  5. 2024Value-Incentivized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Online and Offline RLHF
  6. 2024Reward Model Learning vs. Direct Policy Optimization: A Comparative Analysis of Learning from Human Preferences
  7. 2025VRPO: Rethinking Value Modeling for Robust RL under Noisy Supervision in LLM Post-Training
  8. 2025Off-Policy Corrected Reward Modeling for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback