Coreset Selection via LLM-based Concept Bottlenecks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Coreset Selection (CS) aims to identify a subset of the training dataset that achieves model performance comparable to using the entire dataset. Many state-of-the-art CS methods select coresets using scores whose computation requires training the downstream model on the entire dataset first and recording changes in the model's behavior on samples as it trains (training dynamics). These scores are inefficient to compute and hard to interpret, as they do not indicate whether a sample is difficult to learn in general or only for a specific downstream model. Our work addresses these challenges by proposing a score that computes a sample's difficulty using human-understandable textual attributes (concepts) independent of any downstream model. Specifically, we measure the alignment between a sample's visual features and concept bottlenecks, derived via large language models, by training a linear concept bottleneck layer and computing the sample's difficulty score using it.We then use stratified sampling based on this score to generate a coreset of the dataset.Crucially, our score is efficiently computable without training the downstream model on the full dataset even once, leads to high-performing coresets for various downstream models, and is computable even for an unlabeled dataset. Through experiments on CIFAR-10/100, and ImageNet-1K, we show that our coresets outperform random subsets, even at high pruning rates, and achieve model performance comparable to or better than coresets found by training dynamics-based methods.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 70 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2025.
Builds on
70 of 86 references.
References · 70
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
38 more
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
- 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2016ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledgecited by 1,065
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
- 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
- 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
- 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 682
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
- 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 510
- 2017AffectNet: A Database for Facial Expression, Valence, and Arousal Computing in the Wildcited by 490
- 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 381
- 2019Selection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep Learningcited by 337
- 2017Few-Shot Learning with Graph Neural Networkscited by 324
- 2022Language in a Bottle: Language Model Guided Concept Bottlenecks for Interpretable Image Classificationcited by 310
- 2022Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 289
- 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 269
- 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 259
- 2018Textual Explanations for Self-Driving Vehiclescited by 226
- 2020Neural Prototype Trees for Interpretable Fine-grained Image Recognitioncited by 213
- 2020MedMNIST Classification Decathlon: A Lightweight AutoML Benchmark for Medical Image Analysiscited by 206
- 2019A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across Scalescited by 202
- 2018Multimodal Explanations: Justifying Decisions and Pointing to the Evidencecited by 179
- 2020Compositional Explanations of Neuronscited by 172
- 2020Attribute Prototype Network for Zero-Shot Learningcited by 160
- 2016Generating Visual Explanationscited by 156
- 2022DeepCore: A Comprehensive Library for Coreset Selection in Deep Learningcited by 146
- 2022Natural Language Descriptions of Deep Visual Featurescited by 136
- 2021Scaling Up Influence Functionscited by 130
- 2024Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)cited by 116
50 most cited of 70 All 70 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.