mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Connecting the geometry and dynamics of many-body complex systems with message passing neural operators

arXiv 2502.15913 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2025cs.LG physics.soc-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The relationship between scale transformations and dynamics established by renormalization group techniques is a cornerstone of modern physical theories, from fluid mechanics to elementary particle physics. Integrating renormalization group methods into neural operators for many-body complex systems could provide a foundational inductive bias for learning their effective dynamics, while also uncovering multiscale organization. We introduce a scalable AI framework, ROMA (Renormalized Operators with Multiscale Attention), for learning multiscale evolution operators of many-body complex systems. In particular, we develop a renormalization procedure based on neural analogs of the geometric and laplacian renormalization groups, which can be co-learned with neural operators. An attention mechanism is used to model multiscale interactions by connecting geometric representations of local subgraphs and dynamical operators. We apply this framework in challenging conditions: large systems of more than 1M nodes, long-range interactions, and noisy input-output data for two contrasting examples: Kuramoto oscillators and Burgers-like social dynamics. We demonstrate that the ROMA framework improves scalability and positive transfer between forecasting and effective dynamics tasks compared to state-of-the-art operator learning techniques, while also giving insight into multiscale interactions. Additionally, we investigate power law scaling in the number of model parameters, and demonstrate a departure from typical power law exponents in the presence of hierarchical and multiscale interactions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 56 of its 108 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2025.

Builds on

56 of 108 references.

References · 56

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  5. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  6. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  7. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  8. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  9. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  10. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
  11. 2018Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Cloudscited by 2,220
  12. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
38 more
  1. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
  2. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,543
  3. 2018Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Web-Scale Recommender Systemscited by 1,133
  4. 2018Hierarchical Graph Representation Learning with Differentiable Poolingcited by 786
  5. 2020Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equationscited by 722
  6. 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 674
  7. 2020Benchmarking Graph Neural Networkscited by 672
  8. 2024KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 634
  9. 2019GraphSAINT: Graph Sampling Based Inductive Learning Methodcited by 618
  10. 2020Principal Neighbourhood Aggregation for Graph Netscited by 477
  11. 2019Self-Attention Graph Poolingcited by 421
  12. 2019Hyperbolic Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 400
  13. 2018Hyperbolic Neural Networkscited by 393
  14. 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 353
  15. 2021Choose a Transformer: Fourier or Galerkincited by 333
  16. 2019Hyperbolic Graph Neural Networkscited by 244
  17. 2018Deep Hidden Physics Models: Deep Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 233
  18. 2021Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problemscited by 220
  19. 2017Network Embedding as Matrix Factorization: Unifying DeepWalk, LINE, PTE, and node2veccited by 197
  20. 2022MIONet: Learning multiple-input operators via tensor productcited by 180
  21. 2020Machine Learning on Graphs: A Model and Comprehensive Taxonomycited by 156
  22. 2023An Expert's Guide to Training Physics-informed Neural Networkscited by 119
  23. 2024A comprehensive and FAIR comparison between MLP and KAN representations for differential equations and operator networkscited by 103
  24. 2022Learning Operators with Coupled Attentioncited by 88
  25. 2020Multiscale Simulations of Complex Systems by Learning their Effective Dynamicscited by 86
  26. 2021Improved architectures and training algorithms for deep operator networkscited by 85
  27. 2020Understanding graph embedding methods and their applicationscited by 50
  28. 2022Nonlocal Kernel Network (NKN): a Stable and Resolution-Independent Deep Neural Networkcited by 45
  29. 2020Network Geometrycited by 31
  30. 2019Incorporating physical constraints in a deep probabilistic machine learning framework for coarse-graining dynamical systemscited by 25
  31. 2024HAMLET: Graph Transformer Neural Operator for Partial Differential Equationscited by 24
  32. 2016A Locally Adaptive Normal Distributioncited by 23
  33. 2022Riemannian Metric Learning via Optimal Transportcited by 21
  34. 2016Multi-scale brain networkscited by 16
  35. 2023AI-Lorenz: A physics-data-driven framework for black-box and gray-box identification of chaotic systems with symbolic regressioncited by 9
  36. 2019Semi-supervised classification on graphs using explicit diffusion dynamicscited by 4
  37. 2016New Online Ecology of Adversarial Aggregates: ISIS and beyondcited by 3
  38. 2018Nonlocal flocking dynamics: Learning the fractional order of PDEs from particle simulationscited by 3

50 most cited of 56 All 56 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.