Forecasting Frontier Language Model Agent Capabilities
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents
Abstract (arXiv)
As Language Models (LMs) increasingly operate as autonomous agents, accurately forecasting their capabilities becomes crucial for societal preparedness. We evaluate six forecasting methods that predict downstream capabilities of LM agents. We use "one-step" approaches that predict benchmark scores from input metrics like compute or model release date directly or "two-step" approaches that first predict an intermediate metric like the principal component of cross-benchmark performance (PC-1) and human-evaluated competitive Elo ratings. We evaluate our forecasting methods by backtesting them on a dataset of 38 LMs from the OpenLLM 2 leaderboard. We then use the validated two-step approach (Release Date→Elo→Benchmark) to predict LM agent performance for frontier models on three benchmarks: SWE-Bench Verified (software development), Cybench (cybersecurity assessment), and RE-Bench (ML research engineering). Our forecast predicts that by the beginning of 2026, non-specialized LM agents with low capability elicitation will reach a success rate of 54% on SWE-Bench Verified, while state-of-the-art LM agents will reach an 87% success rate. Our approach does not account for recent advances in inference-compute scaling and might thus be too conservative.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 20 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2025.
Builds on
20 of 34 references.
References · 20
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
- 2023Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?cited by 523
- 2023An Overview of Catastrophic AI Riskscited by 222
8 more
- 2022Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated datacited by 195
- 2024RE-Bench: Evaluating frontier AI R&D capabilities of language model agents against human expertscited by 175
- 2022Compute Trends Across Three Eras of Machine Learningcited by 163
- 2024Observational Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Language Model Performancecited by 130
- 2024Chinchilla Scaling: A replication attemptcited by 72
- 2024How predictable is language model benchmark performance?cited by 37
- 2024Sloth: scaling laws for LLM skills to predict multi-benchmark performance across familiescited by 24
- 2024Collaborative Performance Prediction for Large Language Modelscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2025Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Taskscited by 156
- 2026The Hot Mess of AI: How Does Misalignment Scale With Model Intelligence and Task Complexity?cited by 10
- 2025Dynamic Risk Assessments for Offensive Cybersecurity Agentscited by 8
- 2026Scaffold Effects on GAIA: A Controlled Comparisoncited by 5
- 2026Frontier AI Forecasting Has a Measurement Problem: An Audit of Progress Evidencecited by 0
- 2026Frontier AI Forecasting Has a Measurement Problem: An Audit of Progress Evidence14 Aug 2026
- 2026Scaffold Effects on GAIA: A Controlled Comparison7 Jun 2026
- 2026The Hot Mess of AI: How Does Misalignment Scale With Model Intelligence and Task Complexity?30 Jan 2026
- 2025Dynamic Risk Assessments for Offensive Cybersecurity Agents23 May 2025
- 2025Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Tasks18 Mar 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026EvalBuilder: Can LLMs Build Efficient Benchmarks?
- 2026CivWorldBench: Evaluating Language World Models in Structured Multi-Agent Sandbox Worlds
- 2026LLM-based Agents for Forecasting and Prediction: Methods, Training, Evaluation, and Applications
- 2026Systematic Capability Benchmarking of Frontier Large Language Models for Offensive Cyber Tasks
- 2024MIRAI: Evaluating LLM Agents for Event Forecasting
- 2026OneMillion-Bench: How Far are Language Agents from Human Experts?
- 2024AI Predicts AGI: Leveraging AGI Forecasting and Peer Review to Explore LLMs' Complex Reasoning Capabilities
- 2025FutureX: An Advanced Live Benchmark for LLM Agents in Future Prediction