mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ACL-rlg: A Dataset for Reading List Generation

arXiv 2502.15692 ↗First posted 30 Dec 2024cs.DL cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Familiarizing oneself with a new scientific field and its existing literature can be daunting due to the large amount of available articles. Curated lists of academic references, or reading lists, compiled by experts, offer a structured way to gain a comprehensive overview of a domain or a specific scientific challenge. In this work, we introduce ACL-rlg, the largest open expert-annotated reading list dataset. We also provide multiple baselines for evaluating reading list generation and formally define it as a retrieval task. Our qualitative study highlights the fact that traditional scholarly search engines and indexing methods perform poorly on this task, and GPT-4o, despite showing better results, exhibits signs of potential data contamination.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2024.

Builds on

5 of 20 references.

References · 5

  1. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
  2. 2023NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmarkcited by 348
  3. 2022SciRepEval: A Multi-Format Benchmark for Scientific Document Representationscited by 129
  4. 2024BM25S: Orders of magnitude faster lexical search via eager sparse scoringcited by 88
  5. 2021Tell Me How to Survey: Literature Review Made Simple with Automatic Reading Path Generationcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.