mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Do we really need the Rademacher complexities?

arXiv 2502.15118 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2025math.ST cs.LG stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the fundamental problem of learning with respect to the squared loss in a convex class. The state-of-the-art sample complexity estimates in this setting rely on Rademacher complexities, which are generally difficult to control. We prove that, contrary to prevailing belief and under minimal assumptions, the sample complexity is not governed by the Rademacher complexities but rather by the behaviour of the limiting gaussian process. In particular, all such learning problems that have the same L2-structure -- even those with heavy-tailed distributions -- share the same sample complexity. This constitutes the first universality result for general convex learning problems. The proof is based on a novel learning procedure, and its performance is studied by combining optimal mean estimation techniques for real-valued random variables with Talagrand's generic chaining method.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2025.

Builds on

4 of 27 references.

References · 4

  1. 2019Mean estimation and regression under heavy-tailed distributions--a surveycited by 136
  2. 2014Learning without Concentrationcited by 50
  3. 2022Covariance Estimation: Optimal Dimension-free Guarantees for Adversarial Corruption and Heavy Tailscited by 14
  4. 2015`local' vs. `global' parameters -- breaking the gaussian complexity barriercited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.