mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Low degree conjecture implies sharp computational thresholds in stochastic block model

arXiv 2502.15024 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2025cs.CC cs.LG math.STcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate implications of the (extended) low-degree conjecture (recently formalized in [MW23]) in the context of the symmetric stochastic block model. Assuming the conjecture holds, we establish that no polynomial-time algorithm can weakly recover community labels below the Kesten-Stigum (KS) threshold. In particular, we rule out polynomial-time estimators that, with constant probability, achieve correlation with the true communities that is significantly better than random. Whereas, above the KS threshold, polynomial-time algorithms are known to achieve constant correlation with the true communities with high probability[Mas14,AS15]. To our knowledge, we provide the first rigorous evidence for the sharp transition in recovery rate for polynomial-time algorithms at the KS threshold. Notably, under a stronger version of the low-degree conjecture, our lower bound remains valid even when the number of blocks diverges. Furthermore, our results provide evidence of a computational-to-statistical gap in learning the parameters of stochastic block models. In contrast to prior work, which either (i) rules out polynomial-time algorithms for hypothesis testing with 1-o(1) success probability [Hopkins18, BBK+21a] under the low-degree conjecture, or (ii) rules out low-degree polynomials for learning the edge connection probability matrix [LG23], our approach provides stronger lower bounds on the recovery and learning problem. Our proof combines low-degree lower bounds from [Hopkins18, BBK+21a] with graph splitting and cross-validation techniques. In order to rule out general recovery algorithms, we employ the correlation preserving projection method developed in [HS17].

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2025.

Builds on

19 of 34 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Community Detection and Stochastic Block Modelscited by 317
  2. 2019Notes on Computational Hardness of Hypothesis Testing: Predictions using the Low-Degree Likelihood Ratiocited by 84
  3. 2014Exact Recovery in the Stochastic Block Modelcited by 77
  4. 2013Spectral redemption: clustering sparse networkscited by 54
  5. 2017The power of sum-of-squares for detecting hidden structurescited by 54
  6. 2020Statistical Query Algorithms and Low-Degree Tests Are Almost Equivalentcited by 51
  7. 2013Community detection thresholds and the weak Ramanujan propertycited by 47
  8. 2018Reducibility and Computational Lower Bounds for Problems with Planted Sparse Structurecited by 35
  9. 2016A General Characterization of the Statistical Query Complexitycited by 27
  10. 2022Continuous LWE is as Hard as LWE & Applications to Learning Gaussian Mixturescited by 26
  11. 2021Robust recovery for stochastic block modelscited by 18
  12. 2016Information-theoretic thresholds for community detection in sparse networkscited by 17
7 more
  1. 2017Optimal hypothesis testing for stochastic block models with growing degreescited by 13
  2. 2018Revealing Network Structure, Confidentially: Improved Rates for Node-Private Graphon Estimationcited by 13
  3. 2019Lifting Sum-of-Squares Lower Bounds: Degree-2 to Degree-4cited by 9
  4. 2020Hardness of Random Optimization Problems for Boolean Circuits, Low-Degree Polynomials, and Langevin Dynamicscited by 7
  5. 2023Precise Error Rates for Computationally Efficient Testingcited by 4
  6. 2024Private graphon estimation via sum-of-squarescited by 3
  7. 2025Computational Lower Bounds for Correlated Random Graphs via Algorithmic Contiguitycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.