Precise Error Rates for Computationally Efficient Testing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We revisit the fundamental question of simple-versus-simple hypothesis testing with an eye towards computational complexity, as the statistically optimal likelihood ratio test is often computationally intractable in high-dimensional settings. In the classical spiked Wigner model with a general i.i.d. spike prior we show (conditional on a conjecture) that an existing test based on linear spectral statistics achieves the best possible tradeoff curve between type I and type II error rates among all computationally efficient tests, even though there are exponential-time tests that do better. This result is conditional on an appropriate complexity-theoretic conjecture, namely a natural strengthening of the well-established low-degree conjecture. Our result shows that the spectrum is a sufficient statistic for computationally bounded tests (but not for all tests). To our knowledge, our approach gives the first tool for reasoning about the precise asymptotic testing error achievable with efficient computation. The main ingredients required for our hardness result are a sharp bound on the norm of the low-degree likelihood ratio along with (counterintuitively) a positive result on achievability of testing. This strategy appears to be new even in the setting of unbounded computation, in which case it gives an alternate way to analyze the fundamental statistical limits of testing.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2023.
Builds on
27 of 67 references.
References · 27
- 2019Notes on Computational Hardness of Hypothesis Testing: Predictions using the Low-Degree Likelihood Ratiocited by 84
- 2017The power of sum-of-squares for detecting hidden structurescited by 54
- 2020Reducibility and Statistical-Computational Gaps from Secret Leakagecited by 50
- 2017Estimation of Low-Rank Matrices via Approximate Message Passingcited by 41
- 2019Subexponential-Time Algorithms for Sparse PCAcited by 41
- 2020Computational Barriers to Estimation from Low-Degree Polynomialscited by 38
- 2018Optimality and Sub-optimality of PCA I: Spiked Random Matrix Modelscited by 33
- 2022The Franz-Parisi Criterion and Computational Trade-offs in High Dimensional Statisticscited by 31
- 2019Computational Hardness of Certifying Bounds on Constrained PCA Problemscited by 30
- 2017Bayesian estimation from few samples: community detection and related problemscited by 28
- 2018High-dimensional estimation via sum-of-squares proofscited by 25
- 2021Lattice-Based Methods Surpass Sum-of-Squares in Clusteringcited by 25
15 more
- 2013Limits of local algorithms over sparse random graphscited by 23
- 2018Fundamental limits of detection in the spiked Wigner modelcited by 18
- 2015Phase Transitions in Sparse PCAcited by 15
- 2021Non-Gaussian Component Analysis via Lattice Basis Reductioncited by 14
- 2017Optimal hypothesis testing for stochastic block models with growing degreescited by 13
- 2020Spectral Planting and the Hardness of Refuting Cuts, Colorability, and Communities in Random Graphscited by 13
- 2020Counterexamples to the Low-Degree Conjecturecited by 12
- 2020Computationally efficient sparse clusteringcited by 12
- 2021Reconstruction on Trees and Low-Degree Polynomialscited by 10
- 2020Hypothesis testing with low-degree polynomials in the Morris class of exponential familiescited by 7
- 2023Is Planted Coloring Easier than Planted Clique?cited by 7
- 2021Detection of Signal in the Spiked Rectangular Modelscited by 4
- 2022Is it easier to count communities than find them?cited by 4
- 2020Weak Detection in the Spiked Wigner Model with General Rankcited by 3
- 2018Weak detection in the spiked Wigner modelcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Low coordinate degree algorithms I: Universality of computational thresholds for hypothesis testingcited by 3
- 2025Computational Lower Bounds for Correlated Random Graphs via Algorithmic Contiguitycited by 3
- 2025Low degree conjecture implies sharp computational thresholds in stochastic block modelcited by 3
- 2026Low-Degree Method Fails to Predict Robust Subspace Recoverycited by 0
- 2026Low-Degree Method Fails to Predict Robust Subspace Recovery3 Mar 2026
- 2025Low degree conjecture implies sharp computational thresholds in stochastic block model20 Feb 2025
- 2025Computational Lower Bounds for Correlated Random Graphs via Algorithmic Contiguity14 Feb 2025
- 2024Low coordinate degree algorithms I: Universality of computational thresholds for hypothesis testing12 Mar 2024