Obliviate: Efficient Unmemorization for Protecting Intellectual Property in Large Language Models
On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent copyright agreements between AI companies and content creators underscore the need for fine-grained control over language models' ability to reproduce copyrighted text. Existing defenses-ranging from aggressive unlearning to simplistic output filters-either sacrifice model utility or inadequately address verbatim leakage. We introduce Obliviate, a lightweight post-training method that surgically suppresses exact reproduction of specified sequences while preserving semantic understanding. Obliviate first identifies memorized passages and then, for each target token, minimally adjusts the model's output distribution via a Kullback-Leibler divergence penalty to drive down the probability of exact reproduction. Simultaneously, we enforce a consistency loss on non-target tokens to retain the model's fluency and task performance. We evaluate Obliviate on four popular 6-8B-parameter models (LLaMA-3.1, LLaMA-3.1-Instruct, Qwen-2.5, and Yi-1.5) using synthetic memorization benchmarks and organic copyrighted excerpts (e.g., Moby Dick, Frankenstein, Alice in Wonderland and Les Miserables). Across all settings, Obliviate reduces verbatim recall by two orders of magnitude (e.g., from hundreds of words to fewer than 12) while degrading downstream accuracy by at most 1% on HellaSwag, MMLU, TruthfulQA, and Winogrande. Furthermore, we benchmark Obliviate aganist different unlearning and copyright techniques using the MUSE and CoTaEval benchmarks. These results position Obliviate as a practical, high-fidelity solution for copyright compliance in deployed LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 35 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2025.
Builds on
35 of 44 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearning9 Oct
- 2024MUSE: Machine Unlearning Six-Way Evaluation for Language Models8 Jul
- 2024Rethinking LLM Memorization through the Lens of Adversarial Compression23 Apr
- 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
- 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMs3 Oct
- 2022Deep Unlearning via Randomized Conditionally Independent Hessians15 Apr
- 2022Continual Learning and Private Unlearning24 Mar
- 2021Unrolling SGD: Understanding Factors Influencing Machine Unlearning27 Sep
Other references · 27
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
- 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 755
- 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 706
- 2024Yi: Open Foundation Models by 01.AIcited by 706
15 more
- 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 705
- 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 599
- 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 512
- 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 475
- 2022Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 309
- 2020Amnesiac Machine Learningcited by 305
- 2020When Machine Unlearning Jeopardizes Privacycited by 181
- 2020Forgetting Outside the Box: Scrubbing Deep Networks of Information Accessible from Input-Output Observationscited by 171
- 2021Counterfactual Memorization in Neural Language Modelscited by 155
- 2020Radioactive data: tracing through trainingcited by 67
- 2022PUMA: Performance Unchanged Model Augmentation for Training Data Removalcited by 56
- 2024Watermarking Makes Language Models Radioactivecited by 52
- 2024Be like a Goldfish, Don't Memorize! Mitigating Memorization in Generative LLMscited by 50
- 2024Membership Inference Attacks Cannot Prove that a Model Was Trained On Your Datacited by 49
- 2024Evaluating Copyright Takedown Methods for Language Modelscited by 42
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4.
4 papers.
- 2025Model Unlearning via Sparse Autoencoder Subspace Guided Projectionscited by 17
- 2025SoK: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2025R-TOFU: Unlearning in Large Reasoning Modelscited by 8
- 2025A Survey on Unlearning in Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2025A Survey on Unlearning in Large Language Models29 Oct 2025
- 2025SoK: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models10 Jun 2025
- 2025Model Unlearning via Sparse Autoencoder Subspace Guided Projections30 May 2025
- 2025R-TOFU: Unlearning in Large Reasoning Models21 May 2025