mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Invariance to Node Identifiers in Graph Neural Networks

arXiv 2502.13660 ↗First posted 19 Feb 2025cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Message-Passing Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are known to have limited expressive power, due to their message passing structure. One mechanism for circumventing this limitation is to add unique node identifiers (IDs), which break the symmetries that underlie the expressivity limitation. In this work, we highlight a key limitation of the ID framework, and propose an approach for addressing it. We begin by observing that the final output of the GNN should clearly not depend on the specific IDs used. We then show that in practice this does not hold, and thus the learned network does not possess this desired structural property. Such invariance to node IDs may be enforced in several ways, and we discuss their theoretical properties. We then propose a novel regularization method that effectively enforces ID invariance to the network. Extensive evaluations on both real-world and synthetic tasks demonstrate that our approach significantly improves ID invariance and, in turn, often boosts generalization performance.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2025.

Builds on

25 of 33 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  4. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  5. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
  6. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
  7. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,163
  8. 2015Spatial Transformer Networkscited by 1,429
  9. 2020A Generalization of Transformer Networks to Graphscited by 661
  10. 2020Improving Graph Neural Network Expressivity via Subgraph Isomorphism Countingcited by 313
  11. 2020Can Graph Neural Networks Count Substructures?cited by 236
  12. 2020Generalization and Representational Limits of Graph Neural Networkscited by 218
13 more
  1. 2019What graph neural networks cannot learn: depth vs widthcited by 201
  2. 2020The Surprising Power of Graph Neural Networks with Random Node Initializationcited by 198
  3. 2021Identity-aware Graph Neural Networkscited by 198
  4. 2020Random Features Strengthen Graph Neural Networkscited by 186
  5. 2019Relational Pooling for Graph Representationscited by 150
  6. 2021DropGNN: Random Dropouts Increase the Expressiveness of Graph Neural Networkscited by 118
  7. 2016TI-POOLING: transformation-invariant pooling for feature learning in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 67
  8. 2020Learning Invariances in Neural Networkscited by 52
  9. 2023Graph Positional and Structural Encodercited by 33
  10. 2023Graph Positional Encoding via Random Feature Propagationcited by 31
  11. 2023Graph Neural Networks Use Graphs When They Shouldn'tcited by 26
  12. 2023Graph Invariant Learning with Subgraph Co-mixup for Out-Of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 18
  13. 2024Learning Invariant Representations of Graph Neural Networks via Cluster Generalizationcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.