Smoothed Normalization for Efficient Distributed Private Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning enables training machine learning models while preserving the privacy of participants. Surprisingly, there is no differentially private distributed method for smooth, non-convex optimization problems. The reason is that standard privacy techniques require bounding the participants' contributions, usually enforced via textitclipping of the updates. Existing literature typically ignores the effect of clipping by assuming the boundedness of gradient norms or analyzes distributed algorithms with clipping but ignores DP constraints. In this work, we study an alternative approach via textitsmoothed normalization of the updates motivated by its favorable performance in the single-node setting. By integrating smoothed normalization with an error-feedback mechanism, we design a new distributed algorithm α-sf NormEC. We prove that our method achieves a superior convergence rate over prior works. By extending α-sf NormEC to the DP setting, we obtain the first differentially private distributed optimization algorithm with provable convergence guarantees. Finally, our empirical results from neural network training indicate robust convergence of α-sf NormEC across different parameter settings.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2025.
Builds on
58 of 79 references.
References · 58
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 528
- 2018Sparsified SGD with Memorycited by 373
- 2021High-Performance Large-Scale Image Recognition Without Normalizationcited by 359
- 2019Why gradient clipping accelerates training: A theoretical justification for adaptivitycited by 335
- 2019Error Feedback Fixes SignSGD and other Gradient Compression Schemescited by 306
- 2019Tighter Theory for Local SGD on Identical and Heterogeneous Datacited by 266
- 2019Can You Really Backdoor Federated Learning?cited by 250
38 more
- 2018The Convergence of Sparsified Gradient Methodscited by 228
- 2019Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive Clippingcited by 218
- 2017Regularizing and Optimizing LSTM Language Modelscited by 205
- 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 150
- 2020On Biased Compression for Distributed Learningcited by 140
- 2020Understanding Gradient Clipping in Private SGD: A Geometric Perspectivecited by 140
- 2020Learning from History for Byzantine Robust Optimizationcited by 137
- 2021EF21: A New, Simpler, Theoretically Better, and Practically Faster Error Feedbackcited by 131
- 2021When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Privatecited by 126
- 2017Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points Icited by 125
- 2020Stochastic Optimization with Heavy-Tailed Noise via Accelerated Gradient Clippingcited by 104
- 2021Hyperparameter Tuning with Renyi Differential Privacycited by 104
- 2019DoubleSqueeze: Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descent with Double-Pass Error-Compensated Compressioncited by 98
- 2022Toward Training at ImageNet Scale with Differential Privacycited by 87
- 2022Automatic Clipping: Differentially Private Deep Learning Made Easier and Strongercited by 87
- 2023Revisiting Gradient Clipping: Stochastic bias and tight convergence guaranteescited by 83
- 2018Error Compensated Quantized SGD and its Applications to Large-scale Distributed Optimizationcited by 76
- 2015Beyond Convexity: Stochastic Quasi-Convex Optimizationcited by 75
- 2021Differentially Private Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Datacited by 74
- 2020Linearly Converging Error Compensated SGDcited by 61
- 2024From Gradient Clipping to Normalization for Heavy Tailed SGDcited by 48
- 2020Error Compensated Distributed SGD Can Be Acceleratedcited by 45
- 2022Normalized/Clipped SGD with Perturbation for Differentially Private Non-Convex Optimizationcited by 35
- 2022SoteriaFL: A Unified Framework for Private Federated Learning with Communication Compressioncited by 34
- 2023Momentum Provably Improves Error Feedback!cited by 31
- 2016The Power of Normalization: Faster Evasion of Saddle Pointscited by 29
- 2023Parameter-Agnostic Optimization under Relaxed Smoothnesscited by 29
- 2019Efficient Privacy-Preserving Stochastic Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 27
- 2022Private Non-Convex Federated Learning Without a Trusted Servercited by 26
- 2024Methods for Convex (L0,L1)-Smooth Optimization: Clipping, Acceleration, and Adaptivitycited by 25
- 2023High-Probability Convergence for Composite and Distributed Stochastic Minimization and Variational Inequalities with Heavy-Tailed Noisecited by 22
- 2022A Communication-Efficient Distributed Gradient Clipping Algorithm for Training Deep Neural Networkscited by 20
- 2020Private and Communication-Efficient Edge Learning: A Sparse Differential Gaussian-Masking Distributed SGD Approachcited by 18
- 2024Clipping Improves Adam-Norm and AdaGrad-Norm when the Noise Is Heavy-Tailedcited by 18
- 2024Optimizing (L0, L1)-Smooth Functions by Gradient Methodscited by 18
- 2023EControl: Fast Distributed Optimization with Compression and Error Controlcited by 14
- 2023DIFF2: Differential Private Optimization via Gradient Differences for Nonconvex Distributed Learningcited by 10
- 2023Clip21: Error Feedback for Gradient Clippingcited by 10
50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.