mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

What Scalable Second-Order Information Knows for Pruning at Initialization

arXiv 2502.11450 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pruning remains an effective strategy for reducing both the costs and environmental impact associated with deploying large neural networks (NNs) while maintaining performance. Classical methods, such as OBD (LeCun et al., 1989) and OBS (Hassibi et al., 1992), demonstrate that utilizing curvature information can significantly enhance the balance between network complexity and performance. However, the computation and storage of the Hessian matrix make it impractical for modern NNs, motivating the use of approximations. Recent research (Gur et al., 2018; Karakida et al., 2019) suggests that the top eigenvalues guide optimization in a small subspace, are identifiable early, and remain consistent during training. Motivated by these findings, we revisit pruning at initialization (PaI) to evaluate scalable, unbiased second-order approximations, such as the Empirical Fisher and Hutchinson diagonals. Our experiments show that these methods capture sufficient curvature information to improve the identification of critical parameters compared to first-order baselines, while maintaining linear complexity. Additionally, we empirically demonstrate that updating batch normalization statistics as a warmup phase improves the performance of data-dependent criteria and mitigates the issue of layer collapse. Notably, Hutchinson-based criteria consistently outperformed or matched existing PaI algorithms across various models (including VGG, ResNet, and ViT) and datasets (such as CIFAR-10/100, TinyImageNet, and ImageNet). Our findings suggest that scalable second-order approximations strike an effective balance between computational efficiency and accuracy, making them a valuable addition to the pruning toolkit. We make our code available.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2025.

Builds on

31 of 52 references.

References · 31

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  4. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  5. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  6. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
  7. 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 812
  8. 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
  9. 2020Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowcited by 479
  10. 2020Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient Flowcited by 471
  11. 2014Exploiting Linear Structure Within Convolutional Networks for Efficient Evaluationcited by 306
  12. 2024A Survey on Knowledge Distillation of Large Language Modelscited by 284
19 more
  1. 2021Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 242
  2. 2018Gradient Descent Happens in a Tiny Subspacecited by 217
  3. 2020ADAHESSIAN: An Adaptive Second Order Optimizer for Machine Learningcited by 202
  4. 2023A Survey on Deep Neural Network Pruning-Taxonomy, Comparison, Analysis, and Recommendationscited by 202
  5. 2020Pruning Neural Networks at Initialization: Why are We Missing the Mark?cited by 182
  6. 2021Group Fisher Pruning for Practical Network Compressioncited by 131
  7. 2018Faster gaze prediction with dense networks and Fisher pruningcited by 94
  8. 2018Universal Statistics of Fisher Information in Deep Neural Networks: Mean Field Approachcited by 91
  9. 2020Sanity-Checking Pruning Methods: Random Tickets can Win the Jackpotcited by 66
  10. 2021iDARTS: Differentiable Architecture Search with Stochastic Implicit Gradientscited by 51
  11. 2020Natural Language Processing Advancements By Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 50
  12. 2021Recent Advances on Neural Network Pruning at Initializationcited by 41
  13. 2022Rare Gems: Finding Lottery Tickets at Initializationcited by 34
  14. 2021Hessian Eigenspectra of More Realistic Nonlinear Modelscited by 33
  15. 2022SuperTickets: Drawing Task-Agnostic Lottery Tickets from Supernets via Jointly Architecture Searching and Parameter Pruningcited by 12
  16. 2024Trade-Offs of Diagonal Fisher Information Matrix Estimatorscited by 10
  17. 2022SInGE: Sparsity via Integrated Gradients Estimation of Neuron Relevancecited by 9
  18. 2024No Free Prune: Information-Theoretic Barriers to Pruning at Initializationcited by 8
  19. 2024Revisiting Scalable Hessian Diagonal Approximations for Applications in Reinforcement Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.