Representation Learning on Out of Distribution in Tabular Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The open-world assumption in model development suggests that a model might lack sufficient information to adequately handle data that is entirely distinct or out of distribution (OOD). While deep learning methods have shown promising results in handling OOD data through generalization techniques, they often require specialized hardware that may not be accessible to all users. We present TCL, a lightweight yet effective solution that operates efficiently on standard CPU hardware. Our approach adapts contrastive learning principles specifically for tabular data structures, incorporating full matrix augmentation and simplified loss calculation. Through comprehensive experiments across 10 diverse datasets, we demonstrate that TCL outperforms existing models, including FT-Transformer and ResNet, particularly in classification tasks, while maintaining competitive performance in regression problems. TCL achieves these results with significantly reduced computational requirements, making it accessible to users with limited hardware capabilities. This study also provides practical guidance for detecting and evaluating OOD data through straightforward experiments and visualizations. Our findings show that TCL offers a promising balance between performance and efficiency in handling OOD prediction tasks, which is particularly beneficial for general machine learning practitioners working with computational constraints.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2025.
Builds on
23 of 38 references.
References · 23
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
- 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 648
- 2017Self-Normalizing Neural Networkscited by 598
- 2015Towards Open Set Deep Networkscited by 538
- 2020Generalized ODIN: Detecting Out-of-distribution Image without Learning from Out-of-distribution Datacited by 408
- 2020DCN V2: Improved Deep & Cross Network and Practical Lessons for Web-scale Learning to Rank Systemscited by 327
- 2018AutoInt: Automatic Feature Interaction Learning via Self-Attentive Neural Networkscited by 320
11 more
- 2019Neural Oblivious Decision Ensembles for Deep Learning on Tabular Datacited by 203
- 2016Speed/accuracy trade-offs for modern convolutional object detectorscited by 198
- 2021SCARF: Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning using Random Feature Corruptioncited by 156
- 2013Introducing LETOR 4.0 Datasetscited by 121
- 2021SubTab: Subsetting Features of Tabular Data for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 104
- 2023TabR: Tabular Deep Learning Meets Nearest Neighbors in 2023cited by 74
- 2020The De-democratization of AI: Deep Learning and the Compute Divide in Artificial Intelligence Researchcited by 67
- 2020Gradient Boosting Neural Networks: GrowNetcited by 46
- 2021Multi-Class Data Description for Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 19
- 2018Computational Power and the Social Impact of Artificial Intelligencecited by 5
- 2024Contrastive Federated Learning with Tabular Data Siloscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.