mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Confidence-calibrated covariate shift correction for few-shot classification in Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2502.07847 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 6

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Since the establishment of vision-language foundation models as the new mainstay in low-shot vision classification tasks, the question of domain generalization arising from insufficient target data is assuming more importance. This scarcity challenge induces sampling bias and amplifies model sensitivity to variations and shifts in data distributions. While fine-tuning on multiple domains could mitigate such domain generalization issues, it is resource-intensive and demands diverse data sources. In this work, we systematically analyze two critical challenges: (1) covariate shift between the pre-training distribution and the underspecified target distribution, and (2) confidence misalignment, where predictions on novel data are overconfident. To address both challenges simultaneously, we introduce Confidence-Calibrated Covariate Shift Correction (CalShift) -- a unified approach that combines a Fisher information penalty to mitigate covariate shift and a Confidence Misalignment Penalty (CMP) to reduce overconfidence in misclassified examples. Experimental evaluations across various vision and covariate shift benchmarks demonstrate that CalShift significantly improves model calibration, achieving up to a 5.82% reduction in Expected Calibration Error (ECE). Furthermore, CalShift enhances robustness, improving accuracy by 3.5% on challenging datasets impacted by covariate shifts. Our results highlight CalShift as a promising strategy for building robust and reliable low-shot vision-language systems for real-world applications.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 42 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2025.

Builds on

42 of 72 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Understanding and Mitigating Miscalibration in Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models3 Oct
  2. 2024Toward a Holistic Evaluation of Robustness in CLIP Models2 Oct
  3. 2024Open-Vocabulary Calibration for Fine-tuned CLIP7 Feb
  4. 2023Align Your Prompts: Test-Time Prompting with Distribution Alignment for Zero-Shot Generalization2 Nov
  5. 2021Tip-Adapter: Training-free CLIP-Adapter for Better Vision-Language Modeling6 Nov
  6. 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapters9 Oct
  7. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models2 Sep

Other references · 35

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  5. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  6. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
  7. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  8. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  9. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  10. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  11. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  12. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
23 more
  1. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
  2. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  3. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
  4. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
  5. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
  6. 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 986
  7. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
  8. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
  9. 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 687
  10. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 464
  11. 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 309
  12. 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 305
  13. 2023Large Language Models as Commonsense Knowledge for Large-Scale Task Planningcited by 231
  14. 2023Calibrated Language Models Must Hallucinatecited by 115
  15. 2024Vaccine: Perturbation-aware Alignment for Large Language Models against Harmful Fine-tuning Attackcited by 115
  16. 2023Calibration in Deep Learning: A Survey of the State-of-the-Artcited by 75
  17. 2023BlackVIP: Black-Box Visual Prompting for Robust Transfer Learningcited by 70
  18. 2023Generalization Bounds: Perspectives from Information Theory and PAC-Bayescited by 61
  19. 2021When and How Mixup Improves Calibrationcited by 60
  20. 2021PAC-Bayes Information Bottleneckcited by 28
  21. 2024Robust Calibration of Large Vision-Language Adapterscited by 28
  22. 2024Any-Shift Prompting for Generalization over Distributionscited by 24
  23. 2025Technical report on label-informed logit redistribution for better domain generalization in low-shot classification with foundation modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Robust Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models for Domain Generalization
  2. 2024UMFC: Unsupervised Multi-Domain Feature Calibration for Vision-Language Models
  3. 2026Domain Recentering and Confidence-Weighted Prior Calibration for Vision-Language Models
  4. 2023Towards Calibrated Robust Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026Respect Your Zero-Shot Uncertainty: Conservative Calibration for Test-Time-Adapted Vision-Language Models
  6. 2024Low-Rank Few-Shot Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
  7. 2026The Blending Ratio Is Not Where the Performance Is: Diagnosing Prototype Blending for Few-Shot Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
  8. 2024An Empirical Study Into What Matters for Calibrating Vision-Language Models