mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SyncMind: Measuring Agent Out-of-Sync Recovery in Collaborative Software Engineering

arXiv 2502.06994 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2025cs.SE cs.AI cs.CLcited by 8

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Software engineering (SE) is increasingly collaborative, with developers working together on shared complex codebases. Effective collaboration in shared environments requires participants -- whether humans or AI agents -- to stay on the same page as their environment evolves. When a collaborator's understanding diverges from the current state -- what we term the out-of-sync challenge -- the collaborator's actions may fail, leading to integration issues. In this work, we introduce SyncMind, a framework that systematically defines the out-of-sync problem faced by large language model (LLM) agents in collaborative software engineering (CSE). Based on SyncMind, we create SyncBench, a benchmark featuring 24,332 instances of agent out-of-sync scenarios in real-world CSE derived from 21 popular GitHub repositories with executable verification tests. Experiments on SyncBench uncover critical insights into existing LLM agents' capabilities and limitations. Besides substantial performance gaps among agents (from Llama-3.1 agent <= 3.33% to Claude-3.5-Sonnet >= 28.18%), their consistently low collaboration willingness (<= 4.86%) suggests fundamental limitations of existing LLM in CSE. However, when collaboration occurs, it positively correlates with out-of-sync recovery success. Minimal performance differences in agents' resource-aware out-of-sync recoveries further reveal their significant lack of resource awareness and adaptability, shedding light on future resource-efficient collaborative systems. Code and data are openly available on our project website: https://xhguo7.github.io/SyncMind/.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 5 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2025.

Builds on

5 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents23 Jul
  2. 2023AgentCoder: Multi-Agent-based Code Generation with Iterative Testing and Optimisation20 Dec

Other references · 3

  1. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  2. 2024SWE-bench Multimodal: Do AI Systems Generalize to Visual Software Domains?cited by 196
  3. 2025CoReQA: Uncovering Potentials of Language Models in Code Repository Question Answeringcited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025From Correctness to Collaboration: Toward a Human-Centered Framework for Evaluating AI Agent Behavior in Software Engineering
  2. 2025The Rise of AI Teammates in Software Engineering (SE) 3.0: How Autonomous Coding Agents Are Reshaping Software Engineering
  3. 2026Rethinking Software Engineering for Agentic AI Systems
  4. 2025Understanding Software Engineering Agents: A Study of Thought-Action-Result Trajectories
  5. 2026Effective Strategies for Asynchronous Software Engineering Agents
  6. 2026From Determinism to Delegation: AI-Native Software Engineering and the Evolution of the Agentic Engineer
  7. 2026Agentic AI in the Software Development Lifecycle: Architecture, Empirical Evidence, and the Reshaping of Software Engineering
  8. 2026SWE-Skills-Bench: Do Agent Skills Actually Help in Real-World Software Engineering?