Sample-efficient Learning of Concepts with Theoretical Guarantees: from Data to Concepts without Interventions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning is a vital part of many real-world systems, but several concerns remain about the lack of interpretability, explainability and robustness of black-box AI systems. Concept Bottleneck Models (CBM) address some of these challenges by learning interpretable concepts from high-dimensional data, e.g. images, which are used to predict labels. An important issue in CBMs are spurious correlation between concepts, which effectively lead to learning "wrong" concepts. Current mitigating strategies have strong assumptions, e.g., they assume that the concepts are statistically independent of each other, or require substantial interaction in terms of both interventions and labels provided by annotators. In this paper, we describe a framework that provides theoretical guarantees on the correctness of the learned concepts and on the number of required labels, without requiring any interventions. Our framework leverages causal representation learning (CRL) methods to learn latent causal variables from high-dimensional observations in a unsupervised way, and then learns to align these variables with interpretable concepts with few concept labels. We propose a linear and a non-parametric estimator for this mapping, providing a finite-sample high probability result in the linear case and an asymptotic consistency result for the non-parametric estimator. We evaluate our framework in synthetic and image benchmarks, showing that the learned concepts have less impurities and are often more accurate than other CBMs, even in settings with strong correlations between concepts.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2025.
Builds on
29 of 50 references.
References · 29
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,148
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 876
- 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
- 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 503
- 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 422
- 2021Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from Stylecited by 312
- 2018Nonlinear ICA Using Auxiliary Variables and Generalized Contrastive Learningcited by 282
17 more
- 2020Concept Whitening for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 225
- 2021Contrastive Learning Inverts the Data Generating Processcited by 221
- 2021Disentanglement via Mechanism Sparsity Regularization: A New Principle for Nonlinear ICAcited by 160
- 2022Interventional Causal Representation Learningcited by 142
- 2019Explaining Classifiers with Causal Concept Effect (CaCE)cited by 135
- 2022CITRIS: Causal Identifiability from Temporal Intervened Sequencescited by 133
- 2021Promises and Pitfalls of Black-Box Concept Learning Modelscited by 131
- 2021Acquisition of Chess Knowledge in AlphaZerocited by 123
- 2017Causal Consistency of Structural Equation Modelscited by 118
- 2021Do Concept Bottleneck Models Learn as Intended?cited by 116
- 2023Multi-View Causal Representation Learning with Partial Observabilitycited by 74
- 2022GlanceNets: Interpretabile, Leak-proof Concept-based Modelscited by 73
- 2019Approximate Causal Abstractioncited by 63
- 2023Identifiability of latent-variable and structural-equation models: from linear to nonlinearcited by 58
- 2024Nonparametric Partial Disentanglement via Mechanism Sparsity: Sparse Actions, Interventions and Sparse Temporal Dependenciescited by 41
- 2022Unit Testing for Concepts in Neural Networkscited by 23
- 2023Interpretability is in the Mind of the Beholder: A Causal Framework for Human-interpretable Representation Learningcited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2025If Concept Bottlenecks are the Question, are Foundation Models the Answer?cited by 15
- 2025When Does Closeness in Distribution Imply Representational Similarity? An Identifiability Perspectivecited by 4
- 2026Matryoshka Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 2
- 2025Intervening to Learn and Compose Causally Disentangled Representationscited by 1
- 2026Beyond identifiability: Learning causal representations with few environments and finite samplescited by 1
- 2026TRACE: A Concept Bottleneck Model for Longitudinal 3D Glioblastoma Response Assessmentcited by 0
- 2026TRACE: A Concept Bottleneck Model for Longitudinal 3D Glioblastoma Response Assessment29 Jun 2026
- 2026Matryoshka Concept Bottleneck Models20 May 2026
- 2026Beyond identifiability: Learning causal representations with few environments and finite samples26 Mar 2026
- 2025Intervening to Learn and Compose Causally Disentangled Representations7 Jul 2025
- 2025When Does Closeness in Distribution Imply Representational Similarity? An Identifiability Perspective4 Jun 2025
- 2025If Concept Bottlenecks are the Question, are Foundation Models the Answer?28 Apr 2025