Quality Assurance for LLM-RAG Systems: Empirical Insights from Tourism Application Testing
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG pipeline design and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper presents a comprehensive framework for testing and evaluating quality characteristics of Large Language Model (LLM) systems enhanced with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) in tourism applications. Through systematic empirical evaluation of three different LLM variants across multiple parameter configurations, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our testing methodology in assessing both functional correctness and extra-functional properties. Our framework implements 17 distinct metrics that encompass syntactic analysis, semantic evaluation, and behavioral evaluation through LLM judges. The study reveals significant information about how different architectural choices and parameter configurations affect system performance, particularly highlighting the impact of temperature and top-p parameters on response quality. The tests were carried out on a tourism recommendation system for the V"armland region, utilizing standard and RAG-enhanced configurations. The results indicate that the newer LLM versions show modest improvements in performance metrics, though the differences are more pronounced in response length and complexity rather than in semantic quality. The research contributes practical insights for implementing robust testing practices in LLM-RAG systems, providing valuable guidance to organizations deploying these architectures in production environments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 11 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2025.
Builds on
11 of 11 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Understanding the Fundamental Design Decisions of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems29 Nov
- 2023Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation26 Sep
Other references · 9
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
- 2024The Faiss librarycited by 376
- 2023Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 324
- 2023Software Testing with Large Language Models: Survey, Landscape, and Visioncited by 166
- 2022Measuring Reliability of Large Language Models through Semantic Consistencycited by 38
- 2024A Software Engineering Perspective on Testing Large Language Models: Research, Practice, Tools and Benchmarkscited by 5
- 2024A Systematic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Natural Language Generation Taskscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Survey
- 2024Evaluating the Efficacy of Open-Source LLMs in Enterprise-Specific RAG Systems: A Comparative Study of Performance and Scalability
- 2025LaRA: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Long-Context LLMs -- No Silver Bullet for LC or RAG Routing
- 2024Retrieval Augmented Generation or Long-Context LLMs? A Comprehensive Study and Hybrid Approach
- 2025When Retrieval Succeeds and Fails: Rethinking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for LLMs
- 2025Tuning LLMs by RAG Principles: Towards LLM-native Memory
- 2024Towards Understanding Systems Trade-offs in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Model Inference
- 2026A Survey on Evaluating Quality and Trustworthiness in LLM-Generated Data