Dynamic Noise Preference Optimization: Self-Improvement of Large Language Models with Self-Synthetic Data
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Although LLMs have achieved significant success, their reliance on large volumes of human-annotated data has limited their potential for further scaling. In this situation, utilizing self-generated synthetic data has become crucial for fine-tuning LLMs without extensive human annotation. However, current methods often fail to ensure consistent improvements across iterations, with performance stagnating after only minimal updates. To overcome these challenges, we introduce Dynamic Noise Preference Optimization (DNPO), which combines dynamic sample labeling for constructing preference pairs with controlled, trainable noise injection during preference optimization. Our approach effectively prevents stagnation and enables continuous improvement. In experiments with Llama-3.2-3B and Zephyr-7B, DNPO consistently outperforms existing methods across multiple benchmarks. Additionally, with Zephyr-7B, DNPO shows a significant improvement in model-generated data quality, with a 29.4% win-loss rate gap compared to the baseline in GPT-4 evaluations.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 21 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2025.
Builds on
21 of 29 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Impact of Preference Noise on the Alignment Performance of Generative Language Models15 Apr
- 2024Investigating Regularization of Self-Play Language Models4 Apr
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 18
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
- 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 654
- 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 394
6 more
- 2016Adversarial Training Methods for Semi-Supervised Text Classificationcited by 280
- 2019FreeLB: Enhanced Adversarial Training for Natural Language Understandingcited by 261
- 2022Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated datacited by 187
- 2023Language Agents with Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Play in the Werewolf Gamecited by 148
- 2024Self-playing Adversarial Language Game Enhances LLM Reasoningcited by 80
- 2022NoisyTune: A Little Noise Can Help You Finetune Pretrained Language Models Bettercited by 43
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Adaptive Batch-Wise Sample Scheduling for Direct Preference Optimization
- 2024Optimizing LLMs with Direct Preferences: A Data Efficiency Perspective
- 2025One Goal, Many Challenges: Robust Preference Optimization Amid Content-Aware and Multi-Source Noise
- 2024Towards Robust Alignment of Language Models: Distributionally Robustifying Direct Preference Optimization
- 2024ROPO: Robust Preference Optimization for Large Language Models
- 2025SeaPO: Strategic Error Amplification for Robust Preference Optimization of Large Language Models
- 2025How Well Can Preference Optimization Generalize Under Noisy Feedback?
- 2024Self-Augmented Preference Optimization: Off-Policy Paradigms for Language Model Alignment