mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A non-zero-sum game with reinforcement learning under mean-variance framework

arXiv 2502.04788 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2025math.OCcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Adversarial robustness and RL in finance

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we investigate a competitive market involving two agents who consider both their own wealth and the wealth gap with their opponent. Both agents can invest in a financial market consisting of a risk-free asset and a risky asset, under conditions where model parameters are partially or completely unknown. This setup gives rise to a non-zero-sum differential game within the framework of reinforcement learning (RL). Each agent aims to maximize his own Choquet-regularized, time-inconsistent mean-variance objective. Adopting the dynamic programming approach, we derive a time-consistent Nash equilibrium strategy in a general incomplete market setting. Under the additional assumption of a Gaussian mean return model, we obtain an explicit analytical solution, which facilitates the development of a practical RL algorithm. Notably, the proposed algorithm achieves uniform convergence, even though the conventional policy improvement theorem does not apply to the equilibrium policy. Numerical experiments demonstrate the robustness and effectiveness of the algorithm, underscoring its potential for practical implementation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Adversarial robustness and RL in finance, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 5 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2025.

Builds on

5 of 59 references.

References · 5

  1. 2019Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithmscited by 567
  2. 2017Stabilising Experience Replay for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 117
  3. 2021Policy Gradient and Actor-Critic Learning in Continuous Time and Space: Theory and Algorithmscited by 101
  4. 2021Policy Evaluation and Temporal-Difference Learning in Continuous Time and Space: A Martingale Approachcited by 84
  5. 2023Exploratory mean-variance portfolio selection with Choquet regularizerscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Reinforcement Learning in High-frequency Market Making
  2. 2025Exploratory Mean-Variance with Jumps: An Equilibrium Approach
  3. 2026Dynamic mean-variance portfolio selection with no-shorting constraints and unknown investment opportunity sets
  4. 2024Mean--Variance Portfolio Selection by Continuous-Time Reinforcement Learning: Algorithms, Regret Analysis, and Empirical Study
  5. 2025Multi-period Asset-liability Management with Reinforcement Learning in a Regime-Switching Market
  6. 2025From Individual Learning to Market Equilibrium: Correcting Structural and Parametric Biases in RL Simulations of Economic Models
  7. 2024Independent RL for Cooperative-Competitive Agents: A Mean-Field Perspective
  8. 2024Deviations from the Nash equilibrium in a two-player optimal execution game with reinforcement learning