mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Zero-shot Meta-learning for Tabular Prediction Tasks with Adversarially Pre-trained Transformer

arXiv 2502.04573 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present an Adversarially Pre-trained Transformer (APT) that is able to perform zero-shot meta-learning on tabular prediction tasks without pre-training on any real-world dataset, extending on the recent development of Prior-Data Fitted Networks (PFNs) and TabPFN. Specifically, APT is pre-trained with adversarial synthetic data agents, who continue to shift their underlying data generating distribution and deliberately challenge the model with different synthetic datasets. In addition, we propose a mixture block architecture that is able to handle classification tasks with arbitrary number of classes, addressing the class size limitation -- a crucial weakness of prior deep tabular zero-shot learners. In experiments, we show that our framework matches state-of-the-art performance on small classification tasks without filtering on dataset characteristics such as number of classes and number of missing values, while maintaining an average runtime under one second. On common benchmark dataset suites in both classification and regression, we show that adversarial pre-training was able to enhance TabPFN's performance. In our analysis, we demonstrate that the adversarial synthetic data agents were able to generate a more diverse collection of data compared to the ordinary random generator in TabPFN. In addition, we demonstrate that our mixture block neural design has improved generalizability and greatly accelerated pre-training.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2025.

Builds on

58 of 87 references.

References · 58

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  7. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  8. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
  9. 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,135
  10. 2021Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolationcited by 1,085
  11. 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 944
  12. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
38 more
  1. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
  2. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  3. 2021Multimodal Few-Shot Learning with Frozen Language Modelscited by 657
  4. 2022TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Secondcited by 643
  5. 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 640
  6. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
  7. 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 536
  8. 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 530
  9. 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 489
  10. 2020TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddingscited by 398
  11. 2022TabDDPM: Modelling Tabular Data with Diffusion Modelscited by 373
  12. 2021True Few-Shot Learning with Language Modelscited by 343
  13. 2021Transformers Can Do Bayesian Inferencecited by 338
  14. 2021SAINT: Improved Neural Networks for Tabular Data via Row Attention and Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 310
  15. 2022Language Models are Realistic Tabular Data Generatorscited by 290
  16. 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- The Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 254
  17. 2018Meta-Learning: A Surveycited by 254
  18. 2022Memorizing Transformerscited by 219
  19. 2023When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?cited by 218
  20. 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
  21. 2019Neural Oblivious Decision Ensembles for Deep Learning on Tabular Datacited by 200
  22. 2022On Embeddings for Numerical Features in Tabular Deep Learningcited by 185
  23. 2019You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principlecited by 181
  24. 2020Auto-Sklearn 2.0: Hands-free AutoML via Meta-Learningcited by 174
  25. 2017OpenML Benchmarking Suitescited by 169
  26. 2018Neural Architecture Optimizationcited by 164
  27. 2021Well-tuned Simple Nets Excel on Tabular Datasetscited by 151
  28. 2022Few-shot training LLMs for project-specific code-summarizationcited by 128
  29. 2020A Survey of Deep Meta-Learningcited by 99
  30. 2020A Survey on Generative Adversarial Networks: Variants, Applications, and Trainingcited by 97
  31. 2023Scaling Transformer to 1M tokens and beyond with RMTcited by 97
  32. 2023XTab: Cross-table Pretraining for Tabular Transformerscited by 81
  33. 2020Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Single-step Adversarial Trainingcited by 75
  34. 2023TabR: Tabular Deep Learning Meets Nearest Neighbors in 2023cited by 73
  35. 2024Large Scale Transfer Learning for Tabular Data via Language Modelingcited by 73
  36. 2024CARTE: Pretraining and Transfer for Tabular Learningcited by 69
  37. 2024LLMs Are Few-Shot In-Context Low-Resource Language Learnerscited by 68
  38. 2023Statistical Foundations of Prior-Data Fitted Networkscited by 59

50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

8 papers.