(GG) MoE vs. MLP on Tabular Data
On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE theory and gating functions
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, significant efforts have been directed toward adapting modern neural network architectures for tabular data. However, despite their larger number of parameters and longer training and inference times, these models often fail to consistently outperform vanilla multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural networks. Moreover, MLP-based ensembles have recently demonstrated superior performance and efficiency compared to advanced deep learning methods. Therefore, rather than focusing on building deeper and more complex deep learning models, we propose investigating whether MLP neural networks can be replaced with more efficient architectures without sacrificing performance. In this paper, we first introduce GG MoE, a mixture-of-experts (MoE) model with a Gumbel-Softmax gating function. We then demonstrate that GG MoE with an embedding layer achieves the highest performance across 38 datasets compared to standard MoE and MLP models. Finally, we show that both MoE and GG MoE utilize significantly fewer parameters than MLPs, making them a promising alternative for scaling and ensemble methods.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE theory and gating functions, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 21 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2025.
Builds on
21 of 33 references.
References · 21
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
- 2021GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Expertscited by 897
- 2021Scaling Vision with Sparse Mixture of Expertscited by 747
- 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
- 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 535
- 2020TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddingscited by 409
- 2020BatchEnsemble: An Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong Learningcited by 371
- 2018AutoInt: Automatic Feature Interaction Learning via Self-Attentive Neural Networkscited by 320
- 2021SAINT: Improved Neural Networks for Tabular Data via Row Attention and Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 319
9 more
- 2023From Sparse to Soft Mixtures of Expertscited by 248
- 2022On Embeddings for Numerical Features in Tabular Deep Learningcited by 186
- 2021SCARF: Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning using Random Feature Corruptioncited by 156
- 2021Well-tuned Simple Nets Excel on Tabular Datasetscited by 151
- 2022A Review of Sparse Expert Models in Deep Learningcited by 148
- 2024TabM: Advancing Tabular Deep Learning with Parameter-Efficient Ensemblingcited by 113
- 2024Better by Default: Strong Pre-Tuned MLPs and Boosted Trees on Tabular Datacited by 92
- 2020An Embedding Learning Framework for Numerical Features in CTR Predictioncited by 37
- 2023TANGOS: Regularizing Tabular Neural Networks through Gradient Orthogonalization and Specializationcited by 32
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Joint MoE Scaling Laws: Mixture of Experts Can Be Memory Efficient
- 2025Convergence Rates for Softmax Gating Mixture of Experts
- 2023Pushing Mixture of Experts to the Limit: Extremely Parameter Efficient MoE for Instruction Tuning
- 2023Towards Convergence Rates for Parameter Estimation in Gaussian-gated Mixture of Experts
- 2024On Least Square Estimation in Softmax Gating Mixture of Experts
- 2023Improving Expert Specialization in Mixture of Experts
- 2018Breaking the gridlock in Mixture-of-Experts: Consistent and Efficient Algorithms
- 2026ExpertWeaver: Unlocking the Inherent MoE in Dense LLMs with GLU Activation Patterns