Examining Two Hop Reasoning Through Information Content Scaling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Prior work has found that transformers have an inconsistent ability to learn to answer latent two-hop questions -- questions of the form "Who is Bob's mother's boss?" We study why this is the case by examining how transformers' capacity to learn datasets of two-hop questions and answers (two-hop QA) scales with their size, motivated by prior work on transformer knowledge capacity for simple factual memorization. We find that capacity scaling and generalization both support the hypothesis that latent two-hop QA requires transformers to learn each fact twice, while two-hop QA with chain of thought does not. We also show that with appropriate dataset parameters, it is possible to "trap" very small models in a regime where they memorize answers to two-hop questions independently, even though they would perform better if they could learn to answer them with function composition. Our findings show that measurement of capacity scaling can complement existing interpretability methods, though there are challenges in using it for this purpose.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2025.
Builds on
12 of 17 references.
References · 12
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
- 2023Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionalitycited by 496
- 2023Language Modeling Is Compressioncited by 225
- 2024The Road Less Scheduledcited by 158
- 2021Saturated Transformers are Constant-Depth Threshold Circuitscited by 137
- 2024Physics of Language Models: Part 3.3, Knowledge Capacity Scaling Lawscited by 137
- 2024Grokked Transformers are Implicit Reasoners: A Mechanistic Journey to the Edge of Generalizationcited by 78
- 2024Neural Networks Learn Statistics of Increasing Complexitycited by 30
- 2024Do LLMs Really Think Step-by-step In Implicit Reasoning?cited by 16
- 2024Initialization is Critical to Whether Transformers Fit Composite Functions by Reasoning or Memorizingcited by 15
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Lessons from Studying Two-Hop Latent Reasoning
- 2025Unveiling the Mechanisms of Multi-Hop Reasoning in Transformers via Identity Bridge
- 2026Layer-Order Inversion: Rethinking Latent Multi-Hop Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2023Memory Injections: Correcting Multi-Hop Reasoning Failures during Inference in Transformer-Based Language Models
- 2024Lost in the Middle, and In-Between: Enhancing Language Models' Ability to Reason Over Long Contexts in Multi-Hop QA
- 2024Do Large Language Models Perform Latent Multi-Hop Reasoning without Exploiting Shortcuts?
- 2026Failure Modes in Multi-Hop QA: The Weakest Link Effect and the Recognition Bottleneck
- 2026On the Limitations of Rank-One Model Editing in Answering Multi-hop Questions