mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

IAO Prompting: Making Knowledge Flow Explicit in LLMs through Structured Reasoning Templates

arXiv 2502.03080 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2025cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive reasoning capabilities, understanding and validating their knowledge utilization remains challenging. Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting partially addresses this by revealing intermediate reasoning steps, but the knowledge flow and application remain implicit. We introduce IAO (Input-Action-Output) prompting, a structured template-based method that explicitly models how LLMs access and apply their knowledge during complex reasoning tasks. IAO decomposes problems into sequential steps, each clearly identifying the input knowledge being used, the action being performed, and the resulting output. This structured decomposition enables us to trace knowledge flow, verify factual consistency, and identify potential knowledge gaps or misapplications. Through experiments across diverse reasoning tasks, we demonstrate that IAO not only improves zero-shot performance but also provides transparency in how LLMs leverage their stored knowledge. Human evaluation confirms that this structured approach enhances our ability to verify knowledge utilization and detect potential hallucinations or reasoning errors. Our findings provide insights into both knowledge representation within LLMs and methods for more reliable knowledge application.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 10 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2025.

Builds on

10 of 40 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Large Language Models as Analogical Reasoners3 Oct

Other references · 9

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  3. 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
  4. 2023PaLM 2 Technical Reportcited by 1,154
  5. 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,103
  6. 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 787
  7. 2021Retrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversationcited by 691
  8. 2024Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 110
  9. 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Critical Societal Domains: Finance, Healthcare, and Lawcited by 72

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Mapping the Minds of LLMs: A Graph-Based Analysis of Reasoning LLM
  2. 2025Improving Large Language Models Function Calling and Interpretability via Guided-Structured Templates
  3. 2026PRISM: A Dual View of LLM Reasoning through Semantic Flow and Latent Computation
  4. 2025Layered Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Multi-Agent LLM Systems: A Comprehensive Approach to Explainable Large Language Models
  5. 2022Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matters
  6. 2023Metacognitive Prompting Improves Understanding in Large Language Models
  7. 2025Chain of Methodologies: Scaling Test Time Computation without Training
  8. 2024Enhancing Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models via Reasoning Patterns