mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ScholaWrite: A Dataset of End-to-End Scholarly Writing Process

arXiv 2502.02904 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2025cs.HC cs.CL q-bio.NCcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Writing is a cognitively demanding activity that requires constant decision-making, heavy reliance on working memory, and frequent shifts between tasks of different goals. To build writing assistants that truly align with writers' cognition, we must capture and decode the complete thought process behind how writers transform ideas into final texts. We present ScholaWrite, the first dataset of end-to-end scholarly writing, tracing the multi-month journey from initial drafts to final manuscripts. We contribute three key advances: (1) a Chrome extension that unobtrusively records keystrokes on Overleaf, enabling the collection of realistic, in-situ writing data; (2) a novel corpus of full scholarly manuscripts, enriched with fine-grained annotations of cognitive writing intentions. The dataset includes LaTeX-based edits from five computer science preprints, capturing nearly 62K text changes over four months; and (3) analyses and insights into the micro-dynamics of scholarly writing, highlighting gaps between human writing processes and the current capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in providing meaningful assistance. ScholaWrite underscores the value of capturing end-to-end writing data to develop future writing assistants that support, not replace, the cognitive work of scientists.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2025.

Builds on

22 of 69 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  5. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
  6. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
  7. 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMscited by 573
  8. 2023Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysiscited by 200
  9. 2022Understanding Iterative Revision from Human-Written Textcited by 57
  10. 2022Read, Revise, Repeat: A System Demonstration for Human-in-the-loop Iterative Text Revisioncited by 46
  11. 2024Latxa: An Open Language Model and Evaluation Suite for Basquecited by 42
  12. 2022Revise and Resubmit: An Intertextual Model of Text-based Collaboration in Peer Reviewcited by 37
10 more
  1. 2023ARIES: A Corpus of Scientific Paper Edits Made in Response to Peer Reviewscited by 34
  2. 2023Open, Closed, or Small Language Models for Text Classification?cited by 34
  3. 2022arXivEdits: Understanding the Human Revision Process in Scientific Writingcited by 26
  4. 2022Towards Automated Document Revision: Grammatical Error Correction, Fluency Edits, and Beyondcited by 20
  5. 2022Improving Iterative Text Revision by Learning Where to Edit from Other Revision Taskscited by 20
  6. 2019Diamonds in the Rough: Generating Fluent Sentences from Early-Stage Drafts for Academic Writing Assistancecited by 16
  7. 2024CASIMIR: A Corpus of Scientific Articles enhanced with Multiple Author-Integrated Revisionscited by 14
  8. 2023Text revision in Scientific Writing Assistance: An Overviewcited by 5
  9. 2023Decoding the End-to-end Writing Trajectory in Scholarly Manuscriptscited by 3
  10. 2024Assessing Generative Language Models in Classification Tasks: Performance and Self-Evaluation Capabilities in the Environmental and Climate Change Domaincited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

9 papers.