mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

e-SimFT: Alignment of Generative Models with Simulation Feedback for Pareto-Front Design Exploration

arXiv 2502.02628 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Diffusion and multimodal model alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep generative models have recently shown success in solving complex engineering design problems where models predict solutions that address the design requirements specified as input. However, there remains a challenge in aligning such models for effective design exploration. For many design problems, finding a solution that meets all the requirements is infeasible. In such a case, engineers prefer to obtain a set of Pareto optimal solutions with respect to those requirements, but uniform sampling of generative models may not yield a useful Pareto front. To address this gap, we introduce a new framework for Pareto-front design exploration with simulation fine-tuned generative models. First, the framework adopts preference alignment methods developed for Large Language Models (LLMs) and showcases the first application in fine-tuning a generative model for engineering design. The important distinction here is that we use a simulator instead of humans to provide accurate and scalable feedback. Next, we propose epsilon-sampling, inspired by the epsilon-constraint method used for Pareto-front generation with classical optimization algorithms, to construct a high-quality Pareto front with the fine-tuned models. Our framework, named e-SimFT, is shown to produce better-quality Pareto fronts than existing multi-objective alignment methods.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and multimodal model alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 11 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2025.

Builds on

11 of 24 references.

References · 11

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  3. 2024KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimizationcited by 264
  4. 2024Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustmentcited by 175
  5. 2023RLTF: Reinforcement Learning from Unit Test Feedbackcited by 114
  6. 2024Controllable Preference Optimization: Toward Controllable Multi-Objective Alignmentcited by 107
  7. 2024Panacea: Pareto Alignment via Preference Adaptation for LLMscited by 80
  8. 2023Contrastive Preference Learning: Learning from Human Feedback without RLcited by 79
  9. 2024RLSF: Fine-tuning LLMs via Symbolic Feedbackcited by 14
  10. 2024Multi-objective Reinforcement learning from AI Feedbackcited by 10
  11. 2024Deep Generative Model for Mechanical System Configuration Designcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Aligning Optimization Trajectories with Diffusion Models for Constrained Design Generation
  2. 2023Beyond Statistical Similarity: Rethinking Metrics for Deep Generative Models in Engineering Design
  3. 2024Generative Design through Quality-Diversity Data Synthesis and Language Models
  4. 2026ParetoTransport: Generative Optimization by Mass Transport Toward The Pareto Front
  5. 2025Generative Digital Twins: Vision-Language Simulation Models for Executable Industrial Systems
  6. 2025Generative Bayesian Optimization: Generative Models as Acquisition Functions
  7. 2025A Reward-Directed Diffusion Framework for Generative Design Optimization
  8. 2026TabPFN for Zero-shot Parametric Engineering Design Generation