mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

OCR Error Post-Correction with LLMs in Historical Documents: No Free Lunches

arXiv 2502.01205 ↗First posted 3 Feb 2025cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Optical Character Recognition (OCR) systems often introduce errors when transcribing historical documents, leaving room for post-correction to improve text quality. This study evaluates the use of open-weight LLMs for OCR error correction in historical English and Finnish datasets. We explore various strategies, including parameter optimization, quantization, segment length effects, and text continuation methods. Our results demonstrate that while modern LLMs show promise in reducing character error rates (CER) in English, a practically useful performance for Finnish was not reached. Our findings highlight the potential and limitations of LLMs in scaling OCR post-correction for large historical corpora.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2025.

Builds on

5 of 27 references.

References · 5

  1. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  2. 2024Poro 34B and the Blessing of Multilingualitycited by 18
  3. 2020An Unsupervised method for OCR Post-Correction and Spelling Normalisation for Finnishcited by 9
  4. 2023Evaluating GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on Grammatical Error Correction for Brazilian Portuguesecited by 5
  5. 2024Post-OCR Text Correction for Bulgarian Historical Documentscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 6.

10 papers.