mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on Grammatical Error Correction for Brazilian Portuguese

arXiv 2306.15788 ↗First posted 27 Jun 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate the effectiveness of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, two large language models, as Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) tools for Brazilian Portuguese and compare their performance against Microsoft Word and Google Docs. We introduce a GEC dataset for Brazilian Portuguese with four categories: Grammar, Spelling, Internet, and Fast typing. Our results show that while GPT-4 has higher recall than other methods, LLMs tend to have lower precision, leading to overcorrection. This study demonstrates the potential of LLMs as practical GEC tools for Brazilian Portuguese and encourages further exploration of LLMs for non-English languages and other educational settings.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2023.

Builds on

9 of 15 references.

References · 9

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 956
  3. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 924
  4. 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 832
  5. 2023ChatGPT Beyond English: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Learningcited by 206
  6. 2023Is ChatGPT a Highly Fluent Grammatical Error Correction System? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 97
  7. 2023ChatGPT or Grammarly? Evaluating ChatGPT on Grammatical Error Correction Benchmarkcited by 77
  8. 2022Grammatical Error Correction: A Survey of the State of the Artcited by 43
  9. 2023Evaluating GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 Models on Brazilian University Admission Examscited by 25

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

5 papers.