FairUDT: Fairness-aware Uplift Decision Trees
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training data used for developing machine learning classifiers can exhibit biases against specific protected attributes. Such biases typically originate from historical discrimination or certain underlying patterns that disproportionately under-represent minority groups, such as those identified by their gender, religion, or race. In this paper, we propose a novel approach, FairUDT, a fairness-aware Uplift-based Decision Tree for discrimination identification. FairUDT demonstrates how the integration of uplift modeling with decision trees can be adapted to include fair splitting criteria. Additionally, we introduce a modified leaf relabeling approach for removing discrimination. We divide our dataset into favored and deprived groups based on a binary sensitive attribute, with the favored dataset serving as the treatment group and the deprived dataset as the control group. By applying FairUDT and our leaf relabeling approach to preprocess three benchmark datasets, we achieve an acceptable accuracy-discrimination tradeoff. We also show that FairUDT is inherently interpretable and can be utilized in discrimination detection tasks. The code for this project is available https://github.com/ara-25/FairUDT
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2025.
Builds on
19 of 49 references.
References · 19
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2021Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challengescited by 364
- 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
- 2015Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Causal Effectscited by 254
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
- 2018Counterfactual Fairness in Text Classification through Robustnesscited by 150
- 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
- 2019Learning Optimal and Fair Decision Trees for Non-Discriminative Decision-Makingcited by 75
- 2018Bias Mitigation Post-processing for Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 72
- 2019Equalized odds postprocessing under imperfect group informationcited by 48
7 more
- 2020Counterfactual Fairness with Disentangled Causal Effect Variational Autoencodercited by 45
- 2020Contrastive Learning for Debiased Candidate Generation in Large-Scale Recommender Systemscited by 38
- 2021Large Scale Prediction with Decision Treescited by 28
- 2020How fair can we go in machine learning? Assessing the boundaries of fairness in decision treescited by 22
- 2017Fair Forests: Regularized Tree Induction to Minimize Model Biascited by 19
- 2021Maxmin-Fair Ranking: Individual Fairness under Group-Fairness Constraintscited by 18
- 2022Learning Optimal Fair Classification Trees: Trade-offs Between Interpretability, Fairness, and Accuracycited by 15
Built on by
Not cited yet.