mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FIRE: Flexible Integration of Data Quality Ratings for Effective Pre-Training

arXiv 2502.00761 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2025cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Selecting high-quality data can improve the pretraining efficiency of large language models (LLMs). Existing methods generally rely on heuristic techniques or single quality signals, limiting their ability to evaluate data quality comprehensively. In this work, we propose FIRE, a flexible and scalable framework for integrating multiple data quality raters, which allows for a comprehensive assessment of data quality across various dimensions. FIRE aligns multiple quality signals into a unified space, and integrates diverse data quality raters to provide a comprehensive quality signal for each data point. Further, we introduce a progressive data selection scheme based on FIRE that iteratively refines the selection of high-quality data points. Extensive experiments show that FIRE outperforms other data selection methods and significantly boosts pretrained model performance across a wide range of downstream tasks, while requiring less than 37.5% of the training data needed by the Random baseline to reach the target performance.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2025.

Builds on

29 of 48 references.

References · 29

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  4. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  5. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  6. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
  7. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
  8. 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,202
  9. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
  10. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
  11. 2021GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Expertscited by 897
  12. 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 765
17 more
  1. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
  2. 2023Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical reportcited by 565
  3. 2019CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Datacited by 548
  4. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
  5. 2021Sentence-T5: Scalable Sentence Encoders from Pre-trained Text-to-Text Modelscited by 463
  6. 2023Sheared LLaMA: Accelerating Language Model Pre-training via Structured Pruningcited by 415
  7. 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 329
  8. 2023SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplicationcited by 303
  9. 2024QuRating: Selecting High-Quality Data for Training Language Modelscited by 157
  10. 2023D4: Improving LLM Pretraining via Document De-Duplication and Diversificationcited by 150
  11. 2024DsDm: Model-Aware Dataset Selection with Datamodelscited by 105
  12. 2024MATES: Model-Aware Data Selection for Efficient Pretraining with Data Influence Modelscited by 100
  13. 2024How to Train Data-Efficient LLMscited by 93
  14. 2022Whose Language Counts as High Quality? Measuring Language Ideologies in Text Data Selectioncited by 53
  15. 2023Self-Influence Guided Data Reweighting for Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 37
  16. 2025Metadata Conditioning Accelerates Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 22
  17. 2025Preference Curriculum: LLMs Should Always Be Pretrained on Their Preferred Datacited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.