mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Inferring from Logits: Exploring Best Practices for Decoding-Free Generative Candidate Selection

arXiv 2501.17338 ↗First posted 28 Jan 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative Language Models rely on autoregressive decoding to produce the output sequence token by token. Many tasks such as preference optimization, require the model to produce task-level output consisting of multiple tokens directly by selecting candidates from a pool as predictions. Determining a task-level prediction from candidates using the ordinary token-level decoding mechanism is constrained by time-consuming decoding and interrupted gradients by discrete token selection. Existing works have been using decoding-free candidate selection methods to obtain candidate probability from initial output logits over vocabulary. Though these estimation methods are widely used, they are not systematically evaluated, especially on end tasks. We introduce an evaluation of a comprehensive collection of decoding-free candidate selection approaches on a comprehensive set of tasks, including five multiple-choice QA tasks with a small candidate pool and four clinical decision tasks with a massive amount of candidates, some with 10k+ options. We evaluate the estimation methods paired with a wide spectrum of foundation LMs covering different architectures, sizes and training paradigms. The results and insights from our analysis inform the future model design.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2025.

Builds on

22 of 33 references.

References · 22

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  5. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  6. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  7. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  8. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  9. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  10. 2022Galactica: A Large Language Model for Sciencecited by 736
  11. 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 706
  12. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 696
10 more
  1. 2020UnifiedQA: Crossing Format Boundaries With a Single QA Systemcited by 475
  2. 2022Dense Text Retrieval based on Pretrained Language Models: A Surveycited by 136
  3. 2022Code4Struct: Code Generation for Few-Shot Event Structure Predictioncited by 70
  4. 2023Learning to Tokenize for Generative Retrievalcited by 66
  5. 2022DICE: Data-Efficient Clinical Event Extraction with Generative Modelscited by 20
  6. 2021HyperExpan: Taxonomy Expansion with Hyperbolic Representation Learningcited by 14
  7. 2022Can NLI Provide Proper Indirect Supervision for Low-resource Biomedical Relation Extraction?cited by 13
  8. 2022Multi-hop Evidence Retrieval for Cross-document Relation Extractioncited by 13
  9. 2023Parameter-Efficient Low-Resource Dialogue State Tracking by Prompt Tuningcited by 8
  10. 2023Mitigating Bias for Question Answering Models by Tracking Bias Influencecited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025(G)I-DLE: Generative Inference via Distribution-preserving Logit Exclusion with KL Divergence Minimization for Constrained Decoding
  2. 2026Beyond Tokens: A Survey on Decoding Methods for Large Language and Vision-Language Models
  3. 2024Adaptive Inference-Time Compute: LLMs Can Predict if They Can Do Better, Even Mid-Generation
  4. 2025READER: Retrieval-Assisted Drafter for Efficient LLM Inference
  5. 2024Improving Open-Ended Text Generation via Adaptive Decoding
  6. 2026XTC: Head-Aware Sampling by Excluding Top Choices
  7. 2024Multi-Candidate Speculative Decoding
  8. 2026Decoding as Optimisation on the Probability Simplex: From Top-K to Top-P (Nucleus) to Best-of-K Samplers