mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

XTC: Head-Aware Sampling by Excluding Top Choices

arXiv 2608.22758 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Standard decoding rules for autoregressive language models promote diversity by rescaling the full next-token distribution or truncating its low-probability tail. These strategies overlook a common regime of open-ended generation in which several continuations are plausible but too much probability mass remains concentrated on the most generic choice. We introduce XTC (Exclude Top Choices), a lightweight head-aware decoding operator that targets this regime directly. XTC identifies tokens whose probabilities exceed an absolute plausibility threshold τ: when at least two qualify, it removes the dominant eligible choices with probability ρ and retains only the weakest plausible alternative before renormalization. Across 60 experiments on Gemma 3 27B Q4, Gemma 3 12B Q6, and DeepSeek R1 14B Q6, with scaling validation on Llama 3.3 70B Q4, XTC improves the diversity-repetition Pareto frontier. On creative generation, Distinct-2 increases by 11--15% and repeat trigrams decrease by 27--47% across the four models. Combined with temperature scaling, gains reach 38% in Distinct-2 and 71% in repeat-trigram reduction over baseline. A blinded Amazon Mechanical Turk study with 150 Master raters yields a 62.3% creativity preference for XTC (p<10-4) without reduced fluency, while a GPT-4o control judge reproduces the Anthropic-judge direction on every measure. On IFEval with Llama 3.3 70B Q4, XTC preserves prompt-level strict accuracy within 1.7 percentage points of baseline while recovering most of the diversity gain; a temperature setting matched on Distinct-2 reduces IFEval by 8.8 points. The effect is additive with temperature and repetition penalties, robust across quantization levels and model families, and consistent across twelve prompt genres. XTC has been adopted by llama.cpp, ExLlamaV2, and text-generation-webui.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

Builds on

46 of 62 references.

References · 46

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  6. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  7. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  8. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  9. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  10. 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
  11. 2023AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for LLM Compression and Accelerationcited by 1,298
  12. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
34 more
  1. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
  2. 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,077
  3. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
  4. 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 762
  5. 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 734
  6. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
  7. 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 609
  8. 2024Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 525
  9. 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 503
  10. 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 491
  11. 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 470
  12. 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 396
  13. 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 376
  14. 2023DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Modelscited by 376
  15. 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 316
  16. 2016Diverse Beam Search: Decoding Diverse Solutions from Neural Sequence Modelscited by 301
  17. 2020Evaluation of Text Generation: A Surveycited by 277
  18. 2022A Contrastive Framework for Neural Text Generationcited by 225
  19. 2017Survey of the State of the Art in Natural Language Generation: Core tasks, applications and evaluationcited by 206
  20. 2023Does Writing with Language Models Reduce Content Diversity?cited by 192
  21. 2024The Effect of Sampling Temperature on Problem Solving in Large Language Modelscited by 170
  22. 2023Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel contentcited by 167
  23. 2022COLD Decoding: Energy-based Constrained Text Generation with Langevin Dynamicscited by 161
  24. 2024Turning Up the Heat: Min-p Sampling for Creative and Coherent LLM Outputscited by 150
  25. 2019Unifying Human and Statistical Evaluation for Natural Language Generationcited by 127
  26. 2024Homogenization Effects of Large Language Models on Human Creative Ideationcited by 127
  27. 2022Truncation Sampling as Language Model Desmoothingcited by 123
  28. 2022Pretrained Language Models for Text Generation: A Surveycited by 122
  29. 2022Locally Typical Samplingcited by 111
  30. 2022On Decoding Strategies for Neural Text Generatorscited by 90
  31. 2022Creative Writing with an AI-Powered Writing Assistant: Perspectives from Professional Writerscited by 69
  32. 2024Detection and Measurement of Syntactic Templates in Generated Textcited by 44
  33. 2024Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and Challengescited by 37
  34. 2025The Homogenizing Effect of Large Language Models on Human Expression and Thoughtcited by 35

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Decoding as Optimisation on the Probability Simplex: From Top-K to Top-P (Nucleus) to Best-of-K Samplers
  2. 2025From Bits to Rounds: Parallel Decoding with Exploration for Diffusion Language Models
  3. 2026Entropy-informed Decoding: Adaptive Information-Driven Branching
  4. 2026SpecBound: Adaptive Bounded Self-Speculation with Layer-wise Confidence Calibration
  5. 2026Top-b: Entropic Regulation of Relative Probability Bands in Autoregressive Language Processes
  6. 2026Adaptive Decoding via Test-Time Policy Learning for Self-Improving Generation
  7. 2025p-less Sampling: A Robust Hyperparameter-Free Approach for LLM Decoding
  8. 2026Learning Adaptive LLM Decoding