mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mitigating Hallucinated Translations in Large Language Models with Hallucination-focused Preference Optimization

arXiv 2501.17295 ↗First posted 28 Jan 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 6

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Diffusion and multimodal model alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Translation (MT) is undergoing a paradigm shift, with systems based on fine-tuned large language models (LLM) becoming increasingly competitive with traditional encoder-decoder models trained specifically for translation tasks. However, LLM-based systems are at a higher risk of generating hallucinations, which can severely undermine user's trust and safety. Most prior research on hallucination mitigation focuses on traditional MT models, with solutions that involve post-hoc mitigation - detecting hallucinated translations and re-translating them. While effective, this approach introduces additional complexity in deploying extra tools in production and also increases latency. To address these limitations, we propose a method that intrinsically learns to mitigate hallucinations during the model training phase. Specifically, we introduce a data creation framework to generate hallucination focused preference datasets. Fine-tuning LLMs on these preference datasets reduces the hallucination rate by an average of 96% across five language pairs, while preserving overall translation quality. In a zero-shot setting our approach reduces hallucinations by 89% on an average across three unseen target languages.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and multimodal model alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 28 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2025.

Builds on

28 of 34 references.

References · 28

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  3. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  4. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,290
  5. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  6. 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 869
  7. 2020Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embeddingcited by 621
  8. 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 598
  9. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translationcited by 390
  10. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Modelscited by 266
  11. 2024Tower: An Open Multilingual Large Language Model for Translation-Related Taskscited by 205
  12. 2021The Curious Case of Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translationcited by 161
16 more
  1. 2020Is MAP Decoding All You Need? The Inadequacy of the Mode in Neural Machine Translationcited by 137
  2. 2023Hallucinations in Large Multilingual Translation Modelscited by 126
  3. 2022Truncation Sampling as Language Model Desmoothingcited by 121
  4. 2021High Quality Rather than High Model Probability: Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Neural Metricscited by 104
  5. 2022Language Generation Models Can Cause Harm: So What Can We Do About It? An Actionable Surveycited by 80
  6. 2022Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Machine Translation: Model Internal Workings Alone Do Well, Sentence Similarity Even Bettercited by 75
  7. 2020Analyzing the Source and Target Contributions to Predictions in Neural Machine Translationcited by 71
  8. 2022Measuring the Mixing of Contextual Information in the Transformercited by 63
  9. 2022Contrastive Search Is What You Need For Neural Text Generationcited by 58
  10. 2023Epsilon Sampling Rocks: Investigating Sampling Strategies for Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Machine Translationcited by 57
  11. 2022Towards Opening the Black Box of Neural Machine Translation: Source and Target Interpretations of the Transformercited by 45
  12. 2023Mitigating Hallucinations and Off-target Machine Translation with Source-Contrastive and Language-Contrastive Decodingcited by 42
  13. 2023HalOmi: A Manually Annotated Benchmark for Multilingual Hallucination and Omission Detection in Machine Translationcited by 35
  14. 2022SALTED: A Framework for SAlient Long-Tail Translation Error Detectioncited by 23
  15. 2019Naver Labs Europe's Systems for the WMT19 Machine Translation Robustness Taskcited by 22
  16. 2022BLASER: A Text-Free Speech-to-Speech Translation Evaluation Metriccited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Theoretical Foundations and Mitigation of Hallucination in Large Language Models
  2. 2024Mitigating Hallucination in Multimodal Large Language Model via Hallucination-targeted Direct Preference Optimization
  3. 2025HAVE: Head-Adaptive Gating and ValuE Calibration for Hallucination Mitigation in Large Language Models
  4. 2024Detecting and Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision Language Models via Fine-Grained AI Feedback
  5. 2024THaMES: An End-to-End Tool for Hallucination Mitigation and Evaluation in Large Language Models
  6. 2026Grounded Post-Training with Hard Examples for Reducing Hallucination in Multimodal Large Language Models
  7. 2025TARS: MinMax Token-Adaptive Preference Strategy for Hallucination Reduction in MLLMs
  8. 2024Mitigating Multilingual Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models