mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A foundation model for human-AI collaboration in medical literature mining

arXiv 2501.16255 ↗First posted 27 Jan 2025cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Systematic literature review is essential for evidence-based medicine, requiring comprehensive analysis of clinical trial publications. However, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) models for medical literature mining has been limited by insufficient training and evaluation across broad therapeutic areas and diverse tasks. Here, we present LEADS, an AI foundation model for study search, screening, and data extraction from medical literature. The model is trained on 633,759 instruction data points in LEADSInstruct, curated from 21,335 systematic reviews, 453,625 clinical trial publications, and 27,015 clinical trial registries. We showed that LEADS demonstrates consistent improvements over four cutting-edge generic large language models (LLMs) on six tasks. Furthermore, LEADS enhances expert workflows by providing supportive references following expert requests, streamlining processes while maintaining high-quality results. A study with 16 clinicians and medical researchers from 14 different institutions revealed that experts collaborating with LEADS achieved a recall of 0.81 compared to 0.77 experts working alone in study selection, with a time savings of 22.6%. In data extraction tasks, experts using LEADS achieved an accuracy of 0.85 versus 0.80 without using LEADS, alongside a 26.9% time savings. These findings highlight the potential of specialized medical literature foundation models to outperform generic models, delivering significant quality and efficiency benefits when integrated into expert workflows for medical literature mining.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2025.

Builds on

29 of 58 references.

References · 29

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  4. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  5. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  6. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  7. 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,611
  8. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  9. 2023LLaVA-Med: Training a Large Language-and-Vision Assistant for Biomedicine in One Daycited by 1,287
  10. 2019ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Modelscited by 1,278
  11. 2023MedAlpaca -- An Open-Source Collection of Medical Conversational AI Models and Training Datacited by 282
  12. 2023The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMscited by 254
17 more
  1. 2023BiomedGPT: A Generalist Vision-Language Foundation Model for Diverse Biomedical Taskscited by 201
  2. 2023MedCPT: Contrastive Pre-trained Transformers with Large-scale PubMed Search Logs for Zero-shot Biomedical Information Retrievalcited by 182
  3. 2024BiomedParse: a biomedical foundation model for image parsing of everything everywhere all at oncecited by 107
  4. 2021MS2: Multi-Document Summarization of Medical Studiescited by 80
  5. 2023Can ChatGPT Write a Good Boolean Query for Systematic Review Literature Search?cited by 54
  6. 2020Generating (Factual?) Narrative Summaries of RCTs: Experiments with Neural Multi-Document Summarizationcited by 52
  7. 2023Summarizing, Simplifying, and Synthesizing Medical Evidence Using GPT-3 (with Varying Success)cited by 40
  8. 2023Can large language models replace humans in the systematic review process? Evaluating GPT-4's efficacy in screening and extracting data from peer-reviewed and grey literature in multiple languagescited by 36
  9. 2024ClinicalBench: Can LLMs Beat Traditional ML Models in Clinical Prediction?cited by 31
  10. 2024Closing the gap between open-source and commercial large language models for medical evidence summarizationcited by 21
  11. 2023Appraising the Potential Uses and Harms of LLMs for Medical Systematic Reviewscited by 18
  12. 2024Accelerating Clinical Evidence Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 15
  13. 2023Jointly Extracting Interventions, Outcomes, and Findings from RCT Reports with LLMscited by 10
  14. 2023Assessing the Ability of ChatGPT to Screen Articles for Systematic Reviewscited by 10
  15. 2024Panacea: A foundation model for clinical trial search, summarization, design, and recruitmentcited by 10
  16. 2024A Perspective for Adapting Generalist AI to Specialized Medical AI Applications and Their Challengescited by 8
  17. 2024High-performance automated abstract screening with large language model ensemblescited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 5.

11 papers.