Option-ID Based Elimination For Multiple Choice Questions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are a popular and important task for evaluating large language models (LLMs). Based on common strategies people use when answering MCQs, the process of elimination (PoE) has been proposed as an effective problem-solving method. Existing PoE methods typically either have LLMs directly identify incorrect options or score options and replace lower-scoring ones with [MASK]. However, both methods suffer from inapplicability or suboptimal performance. To address these issues, this paper proposes a novel option-ID based PoE (PoEID). PoEID critically incorporates a debiasing technique to counteract LLMs token bias, enhancing robustness over naive ID-based elimination. It features two strategies: PoEIDlog, which eliminates options whose IDs have log probabilities below the average threshold, and PoEIDseq, which iteratively removes the option with the lowest ID probability. We conduct extensive experiments with 6 different LLMs on 4 diverse datasets. The results demonstrate that PoEID, especially PoEIDlog, significantly improves zero-shot and few-shot MCQs performance, particularly in datasets with more options. Our analyses demonstrate that PoEIDlog enhances the LLMs' confidence in selecting the correct option, and the option elimination strategy outperforms methods relying on [MASK] replacement. We further investigate the limitations of LLMs in directly identifying incorrect options, which stem from their inherent deficiencies.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2025.
Builds on
21 of 31 references.
References · 21
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,392
9 more
- 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 639
- 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 486
- 2021Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn't Always Rightcited by 263
- 2022Leveraging Large Language Models for Multiple Choice Question Answeringcited by 203
- 2021RiddleSense: Reasoning about Riddle Questions Featuring Linguistic Creativity and Commonsense Knowledgecited by 61
- 2024Can We Trust LLMs? Mitigate Overconfidence Bias in LLMs through Knowledge Transfercited by 19
- 2023It's Not Easy Being Wrong: Large Language Models Struggle with Process of Elimination Reasoningcited by 12
- 2023POE: Process of Elimination for Multiple Choice Reasoningcited by 8
- 2019ElimiNet: A Model for Eliminating Options for Reading Comprehension with Multiple Choice Questionscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.