MARL-OT: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Guided Online Fuzzing to Detect Safety Violation in Autonomous Driving Systems
On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Reinforcement learning for driving
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous Driving Systems (ADSs) are safety-critical, as real-world safety violations can result in significant losses. Rigorous testing is essential before deployment, with simulation testing playing a key role. However, ADSs are typically complex, consisting of multiple modules such as perception and planning, or well-trained end-to-end autonomous driving systems. Offline methods, such as the Genetic Algorithm (GA), can only generate predefined trajectories for dynamics, which struggle to cause safety violations for ADSs rapidly and efficiently in different scenarios due to their evolutionary nature. Online methods, such as single-agent reinforcement learning (RL), can quickly adjust the dynamics' trajectory online to adapt to different scenarios, but they struggle to capture complex corner cases of ADS arising from the intricate interplay among multiple vehicles. Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has a strong ability in cooperative tasks. On the other hand, it faces its own challenges, particularly with convergence. This paper introduces MARL-OT, a scalable framework that leverages MARL to detect safety violations of ADS resulting from surrounding vehicles' cooperation. MARL-OT employs MARL for high-level guidance, triggering various dangerous scenarios for the rule-based online fuzzer to explore potential safety violations of ADS, thereby generating dynamic, realistic safety violation scenarios. Our approach improves the detected safety violation rate by up to 136.2% compared to the state-of-the-art (SOTA) testing technique.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for driving, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 5 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2025.
Builds on
5 of 41 references.
References · 5
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
- 2022Many-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Online Testing of DNN-Enabled Systemscited by 18
- 2023TARGET: Automated Scenario Generation from Traffic Rules for Testing Autonomous Vehicles via Validated LLM-Guided Knowledge Extractioncited by 9
- 2023GARL: Genetic Algorithm-Augmented Reinforcement Learning to Detect Violations in Marker-Based Autonomous Landing Systemscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Survey
- 2025Robust and Safe Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Communication for Autonomous Vehicles: From Simulation to Hardware
- 2024Reinforcement Learning for Online Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems: a Replication and Extension Study
- 2021Multi-Agent Vulnerability Discovery for Autonomous Driving with Hazard Arbitration Reward
- 2021Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning for Cooperative Lane Changing of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed Traffic
- 2021Minimizing Safety Interference for Safe and Comfortable Automated Driving with Distributional Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Meta-Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Fast Adaptation of Interactive Policies with Applications to Autonomous Driving
- 2021Learning to Robustly Negotiate Bi-Directional Lane Usage in High-Conflict Driving Scenarios