Sample complexity of data-driven tuning of model hyperparameters in neural networks with structured parameter-dependent dual function
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern machine learning algorithms, especially deep learning based techniques, typically involve careful hyperparameter tuning to achieve the best performance. Despite the surge of intense interest in practical techniques like Bayesian optimization and random search based approaches to automating this laborious and compute intensive task, the fundamental learning theoretic complexity of tuning hyperparameters for deep neural networks is poorly understood. Inspired by this glaring gap, we initiate the formal study of hyperparameter tuning complexity in deep learning through a recently introduced data driven setting. We assume that we have a series of deep learning tasks, and we have to tune hyperparameters to do well on average over the distribution of tasks. A major difficulty is that the utility function as a function of the hyperparameter is very volatile and furthermore, it is given implicitly by an optimization problem over the model parameters. To tackle this challenge, we introduce a new technique to characterize the discontinuities and oscillations of the utility function on any fixed problem instance as we vary the hyperparameter; our analysis relies on subtle concepts including tools from differential/algebraic geometry and constrained optimization. This can be used to show that the learning theoretic complexity of the corresponding family of utility functions is bounded. We instantiate our results and provide sample complexity bounds for concrete applications tuning a hyperparameter that interpolates neural activation functions and setting the kernel parameter in graph neural networks.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 4.
9 papers.
- 2025Provably data-driven projection method for quadratic programmingcited by 5
- 2025Distribution-dependent Generalization Bounds for Tuning Linear Regression Across Taskscited by 2
- 2026Provably Data-driven Multiple Hyper-parameter Tuning with Structured Loss Functioncited by 2
- 2026Provably Data-driven Lagrangian Relaxation for Mixed Integer Linear Programmingcited by 2
- 2025Tuning Algorithmic and Architectural Hyperparameters in Graph-Based Semi-Supervised Learning with Provable Guaranteescited by 1
- 2025Gradient Descent with Provably Tuned Learning-rate Schedulescited by 1
- 2025Generalization Guarantees for Learning Branch-and-Cut Policies in Integer Programmingcited by 0
- 2026Parameter Tuning with Generalization Guarantees for GPU-Accelerated Linear Programmingcited by 0
- 2026Tight Bounds for Data-driven Multiple Hyper-parameter Tuning with Structured Loss Functioncited by 0
- 2026Tight Bounds for Data-driven Multiple Hyper-parameter Tuning with Structured Loss Function18 Aug 2026
- 2026Parameter Tuning with Generalization Guarantees for GPU-Accelerated Linear Programming7 Jun 2026
- 2026Provably Data-driven Lagrangian Relaxation for Mixed Integer Linear Programming18 May 2026
- 2026Provably Data-driven Multiple Hyper-parameter Tuning with Structured Loss Function2 Feb 2026
- 2025Gradient Descent with Provably Tuned Learning-rate Schedules4 Dec 2025
- 2025Provably data-driven projection method for quadratic programming3 Sep 2025
- 2025Distribution-dependent Generalization Bounds for Tuning Linear Regression Across Tasks7 Jul 2025
- 2025Generalization Guarantees for Learning Branch-and-Cut Policies in Integer Programming16 May 2025
- 2025Tuning Algorithmic and Architectural Hyperparameters in Graph-Based Semi-Supervised Learning with Provable Guarantees18 Feb 2025